Supervision for Instructional Improvement



Supervision for Instructional Improvement

Introduction

The aim of this assignment is to achieve diverse outlooks from the primary individuals who are engaged in the implementation of the instructional improvement. There are five key elements of the supervision however this assignment will discuss only three main tasks that are teacher direct assistance, professional and curriculum development.

In addition, the interviews with fellow teacher and administrator will be summarized to include the important questions about these tasks. The assignment will also describe the necessity of the instructional improvement, how it can be done efficiently and with each task the issues that might arise.

Discussion

Summary of Interviews

Interviews were conducted on the tasks of supervision from a fellow teacher and an administrator. According to them each task of supervision is significant. The direct assistance is the stipulation of individual and enduring contact with the teachers to scrutinize and support in the instructions of the classroom. In response of an answer, both the teacher and administrator stated that the administrators are the people that can make the support effectual directly by giving a comprehensible vision.

In their interview, they described that the teachers play the main roles in building the careers of the students. The teachers make the minds of the students clear and goal oriented by their skills and teachings. The administrators along with the collaboration of the teachers can enhance the learning of the students as answered by both the administrator and teacher.

According to the administrator they can assist the new teachers in the goals of the learning to teach the students. In response to this, the teachers can give them feedback which will make the objectives more clear as stated by the teacher. The issues that might arise in the direct assistance are the lack of understanding between the teachers and the administrators. This will affect the performance of the school or institute as answered in the interview by both professionals.

As asked about the professional development, both of them answered that it involves the opportunities for learning for the faculty that is maintained by the system of the institutes and/or schools. In this part both the individuals answered that the administrators provide the tools of Professional Development Plan (PDP) to the teachers (Farley, 2010).

By this they will effectively teach the students and can benefit them. The issues that might arise can be of the training of teachers properly by the administrators. This will make ...