Roles of the Courtroom

Roles of the Courtroom

Introduction

In the field of law, Courtroom Workgroup is an unofficial arrangement among criminal defense attorney, criminal prosecutor and the judicial officer. This new concept is introduced in the academic discipline of criminal justice for the group effort in valuing justice. The Courtroom Work Group comprises on teams and individuals who work united for effectively prosecuting a Criminal Court Case. The paper highlights about the daily happenings in courtroom and its importance for bringing the justice in an appropriate manner.

Discussion

The formation of a courtroom workgroup consists on jurors, judge, court clerks, expert witness, victim, court reporter, defendants, court bailiffs, defense lawyers, and prosecutors. This particularized group of individuals works collectively for the productively prosecute criminal court cases. The structure of room flourishes to build a care free and safe atmosphere of justice. It is the duty of the team to work attentively for achieving fair judgment to all demonstrated criminal cases. Every single representative is obliged to perform assigned job that is accomplished on a daily basis. The concept of prosecute is to carry out the process from its origin or base to its final rational conclusion. Therefore the courtroom workgroup jointly work from the foundation of Criminal Court Case and leads the case by the system of justice to its reasonable ending (Huemann, 1977).

The Prosecutor is a government official who brings the imputations against the defendant. The prosecutor falls in to elected officials who present a specific state or country during the trial proceedings of criminals. The role of the Prosecutor is to stand against the defendant and defense counselor. He is the fighting power in the criminal trial process and prosecution serves to destroy and attack the legal defenses which the defendant claims during his Criminal Trial. In some sense, the courtroom workgroup is a response to a lack of resources for public defenders. It has been observed that defense attorney does not have ample time to prepare a case in depth for their all clients. Moreover, they also do not possess the adequate budget for fully investigating the realities of a case by private investigators or staff. We should notice here that they usually rely on the information provided by police. In few legal powers, clients do not encounter their attorneys until they visit court. Generally, public defenders meet their clients for the short period of time in jail or holding facilities. It has been analyzed that defense attorney protects his client by looking minor penalty or punishment. According to Huemann (1977) many defense attorneys find forced with their caseloads. This act of force can be evident in the courtroom by watching reproaches of judges for delays. Most of the delicate pressures encourage team involvement in the courtroom workgroup (Rainville. & Reaves, 2003).

The notion of a courtroom is related with appealing bargain. It reflects noteworthy explanatory power in weighing down courts who usually deals with massive caseloads. The model of courtroom workgroup is most suitable to clarify jurisdictions where defense attorneys are ...