Ontological Paradox



Ontological Paradox

Introduction

Inst it interesting that time travel has always remained an exciting subject despite much of the unrealistic debate and attempts to make it possible?

There are two great ironies possible, and two ways to defuse them. Each uses a different conception of time.

The first, more conventional, assumes that time is linear. The time travel is a leap, in turn involving the correction of the timeline. On returning to the past, so I can change the future.

1.I change the future either by mistake unintentionally (Back to the Future).

2.Or because I want to correct a present.

The Paradox

Ontological paradox is a paradox of time travel that questions the existence and creation of data and objects to travel in time. It is closely related to predestination paradox. For example, a man who wants to build a time machine at the age of 30 must stay in his future. A man may plan for his future and begins to build a time machine. As time passes, until he finally quit his machine. Then back in time for his thirtieth birthday, when he gave the plans for the closure of the loop of the past. The paradox is this: When was the first time that he designed the machine, if he surrendered the flat, who created the plans? This is primarily an attempt to interpret the new communication space and time (Sider,1999). The analysis of the historicity of Dasein is an attempt to prove that things are not so "temporary" and that "acts of history," but on the contrary, it is because historically, that the basis of being is characterized by the time. Only the proper time, which, together with the finite, makes possible something like fate, i.e., own historicity. Heidegger analyzes the essential point of this "take care of time" as dated by asking the question: what is "now" and "now-structure" of time? The existential concept grounded in the struggle against conventional wisdom, conventional interpretation of the time. Total user friendly conventional wisdom interpretation of the main thesis of the time is that time is infinite. Heidegger reveals in this interpretation, leveling and covering the world of time and temporality in general. Time gives itself very closely as a continuous series now. Analyzing the Hegelian concept of time, Heidegger concludes that Hegel moves in the direction which includes a widespread understanding of time (Lewis,1976).

The Reason of occurrence and the nature of time paradoxes interested many researchers, there was possible a creation of set of paradoxes on the sample for the first time specified by Aristotle. Occurrence of paradoxes can be connected or with the valid discrepancy of the phenomenon of time, or with its incorrect understanding, or that the logic applied to it or ontology do not answer its nature (Lewis,1976). Time the same as also true, is a source of paradoxes connected with self-applicability. As soon as there is a philosophy and as soon as it is made out in the conceptual plan then there is a question on essence of ...