GOD

GOD

Introduction

The physico-theological proof to the cosmological, cosmological proof, and in turn to the ontological, that aims to argue around this by demonstrating the ineffectiveness of philosophy. It should be noticed right away as the section of the critique of pure reason to conduct a critique of all the evidence of the existence of God, showing at the same time so clear and sharp as the idea of God, properly constituted by the ideal transcendental , is inevitable for the reason: on the one hand, therefore, it has been asserted the inevitability of the idea of God and secondly the inability to prove their existence, thinking that God does not facilitate effective access to the right proof of its existence. It 'important to emphasize that this paradox of reason will be the last Schelling in mind. The transcendental ideal is a veritable abyss of human reason, and this abissalità will reflect a lot, both on the transcendental reason, through a negative philosophy, is the possibility of proving the existence of God, through a positive philosophy.

Discussion

In order to seek the answer for the question we need to first look at the two possible cases Does God exist? And if 'yes' then we are most likely accountable to this supreme authority 'God' and there must be a meaning and reason behind our creation. And if there is no existence of 'God', then we are most likely to be here by chance and we don't have any liability or accountability towards any transcendent being. For the topic on hand, this paper will be summarizing the three arguments which will be focusing on the identifying the existence of God.

Cosmological Argument

The term 'cosmological' is derived from the Greek word 'kosmos' which denote 'world'. It is amongst the few philosophical arguments which attempt to provide the evidence ...