Logic Questions

Logic Questions

Introduction

This paper discusses the various aspects and perspectives of arguments and disagreements on philosophical notions. Questions related to arguments and disagreements are answered. Types of arguments and fallacies due to disputes are also discussed while answering the questions provided.

Discussion

Question - 1

Argument occurs when there are two opposing ideas or concepts presented in premises. It is the situation where the other person opposes the premises of the first person. It is a dispute where individual is determined to persuade others according to his point of view. Disagreement is simply stated as lack of agreement rather than strict opposition. It is the consequence of others not supporting the point of view of an individual instead of opposing his ideas. Disagreements might lead to arguments due to disputes in perspectives. Therefore, it can be stated that disagreement plays a pivotal role in argument. A person needs an opposing or conflicting idea to initiate an argument (Hahn, 2005).

Question - 2

Explanation is a general term which provides the elaboration or support to the premise. However, argument must have concrete logical reasoning to support the premise. Explanations give details regarding the subject, which is under consideration. An argument is a method of reasoning in which the reasons functions as evidence in support of the conclusion. Its objective is to give a sane foundation for accepting the conclusion to be accurate. An explanation is a method of reasoning in which the conclusion is an acknowledged reality and providing clarification for that truth. Its aim is to help follow how or why that truth happens. The example of argument is, “Butch fled when a clown appeared. Butch is afraid of clowns”. The example of explanation is, “Butch was attacked by a clown as a child. Butch is afraid of clowns”.

Question - 3

A valid argument cannot have true premises and a false conclusion. If the premises of deductive argument are true, then its conclusion must be true. This means that an argument is not valid if the premises are true and the conclusion is false. It can be stated that valid arguments have true premises, which leads to a true conclusion while deduction. Otherwise, it would be regarded as an invalid argument. The explanation for this reason is the logical inference from the first premise to second, and finally conclusion. If the inference is accurate of true premises, then the conclusion would be true as well.

Question - 4

Deductive arguments are based on facts and truth. The inference from premises to conclusion is concrete where no intuition is required. The facts presented in the conclusions are inferred directly from the premises. Similarly, inductive arguments are based on intuition where inductive reasoning takes place. The inductive arguments might include various assumptions based on trends and fashions of events. This means that the inductive reasoning incorporates the premises, which supports the conclusion but does not entails it entirely. It follows a pattern where generalization is true for most parts in inferring to conclusion.

Question - 5

The argument presented is an invalid deductive ...