JUST310 ESSAY QUESTIONS

JUST310: Essay Questions



JUST310: Essay Questions

Question 1: Explain David Garland's evolution of the system of crime and punishment …..Reviewed and readings on Blackboard under David Garland.

David Garland, one of the most distinguished specialists in the sociology of crime, presents a thorough and original analysis of crime control that reveals the type of logic and rationality that guides him. Social attitudes and cultural sensibilities that have produced this new culture relinquish control to an increasing extent for the reintegration of the permanent exclusion of a class of new "rogue" relegated to the jailer industries circuits and periodic recurrence. In his book he describes the dramatic changes in crime control and criminal justice that have occurred in Britain and America in the last 25 years. 

The culture of control dramatically demonstrates the extent to which crime is a faithful mirror, though invested, the social practices in a world of consumerism and precarious employment pathologically. Management policies of crime control would have resulted in two major strategies: adaptive and denial or acting out (cathartic) each with a catalog of specific actions.  While the former is oriented towards "normalization" of the crime, its recognition as a fact of life before which the criminal justice cannot do everything there is to reduce opportunities (situational prevention) or to generate patterns of social action to reduce their appearance and impact (preventive associations, community policing, community safety management), in this sense, they are less punitive.

These two strategies have in common the fact that not come to consider the social background of crime, which is a "tare" proper political context that favors emerging economic logic of corporate management. Graph this situation when Garland explains that during the welfare state had less control over economic control criminal, while neoliberal and neoconservative under control there is more criminal and less economic control.

Finally, Garland argues that although this was the path followed by some societies, is not a fate, as other developed societies have walked in other directions is despite having similar economic and social transformations. It all depends on the policy options presented. Nevertheless, we must also keep a critical distance from the context from which one reads this book, because this phenomenon, although largely matching our context, does not explain the reality of the peripheral countries largely have lacked a welfare state, but who have been privileged recipients of neoliberal transformation measures of the state and, more recently, criminal and punitive ideas that these changes ...