CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Criminal Justice System

Criminal Justice System

Historically, each of the 13 original states has its own unique structure of the court. This independence continued after the American Revolution, as a result of the wide differences between the various states, some of which still exist today. Because each state adopted its own court system, the consequence was poorly planned and confusing court system. As a result, several reform movements attempted to streamline and modernize the system (Rottman, 2005).

Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the powers of such court for review of cases, which were then before it. In countries with a single judicial system, judicial power has been optimized to eliminate the courts with limited subject matter jurisdiction, these states do not have separate civil and criminal courts. Issues such as family relations, inheritance, and crime, and criminal cases, all involved in the courts of general jurisdiction. Nevertheless, even in states with unified court system, some cases may be referred to the limited jurisdiction of the courts and other parties, the court of first instance courts of general jurisdiction (Robertson, 2004).

The courts of limited jurisdiction often handle minor criminal cases and civil cases below that amount in U.S. dollars. Criminal cases in lower courts are likely to be limited to misdemeanors. The most common of these traffic offenses, even though these courts may also have a statutory responsibility to hear other, less serious cases (such as shoplifting or theft, vandalism, bad checks, and simple assault). Some inferior courts of civil jurisdiction, as well. These tribunals of their jurisdiction "of small vessels of claims in which the amount in dispute is restricted by law (when something around $ 1000, but due to inflation cap were raised to $ 5000 or even $ 10,000). These claims may lease disputes, breach of contract or minor traffic ...