GENETIC TESTING

Genetic Testing

Genetic Testing

Introduction

Employment testing have stirred as much discussion a few employment practices. Urine samples from psychological questionnaires, the screen to select the devices used by the employer and the worker instead of the courts by civil rights groups and both have been challenged. But in none of the genetic tests is expected to spark more debate. (Hurd, 1990) These tests may place individuals at high risk of developing certain diseases in healthy individuals to detect genetic abnormalities. This kind of testing job applicants and employees in the workplace, because of their genetic, some construction materials such as greater exposure to chemicals or radiation may be the chance of developing the disease is available for the screen.

What is at work, what concerns most is the genetic testing?

Research to date has identified fifty genetic disorders related to toxic or carcinogenic effects of environmental agents thought to increase the sensitivity of a person. People with sickle cell trait, for example, the case of carbon monoxide or cyanide exposure may be at risk for sickle cell anemia. Exposure to lead or be dangerous to human health, especially with petrol thalassemia gene.

Currently, few companies reported using genetic tests, currently available tests can identify a small number of relatively rare diseases are not only expensive to perform, and difficult to manage. However, genetic research and technology, 15 years of accelerated development, $ 3,000,000,000 federally funded Human Genome Project, which aim to solve genetic code of people, less expensive tests are likely soon to be available for simplified That must identify a wide range of heart disease, cancer and worksite exposure, such as manic depression associated with susceptibility to common genetic disorders, including non. These tests have become available; this test is estimated to increase interest. (Joyce, 1990)

Genetic screening is usually advocated as a way of reducing the incidence of occupational disease. Employers can use the information obtained from genetic testing likely to cause harm to them or existing staff to make sure the environment is not included. But critics of this new technology increases the screening of workers rights and racial and ethnic discrimination in the workplace, protect the violation charges to get tested for work-related diseases associated with the non-availability of facilities put in place. Genetic screening may be allowed in the workplace?

Who is screening as whole, workers, employers and society would be for the benefit of those who support the claim that genetic screening. A report by disabling occupational diseases each year, 390,000 workers according to contract, these workers die from 100,000. Workers with information obtained through genetic screening of disease and premature death, disabled workers and their families, emotional, physical and financial costs, frugal, would be dangerous to your health may prevent the work environment. (Kolatan, 1986)

Employers will also benefit from genetic screening. Bureau of labor statistics for the costs of occupational disease in 1981, private sector employers reported 850,000 lost workdays. Litigation over construction related diseases, hazardous substances, employers also imposes heavy costs. Reducing occupational disease, genetic screening, low productivity, excessive ...