Perform a hypothesis test to evaluate whether these two random variables are independent or not.
ANOVA
Y
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
2134.889
2
1067.444
2.164
.196
Within Groups
2960.000
6
493.333
Total
5094.889
8
Ho: The random variable Y and Z are independent.
H1: The random variable Y and Z are not independent.
As from the above table we observed that p value is greater than .05 so we accept null hypothesis and conclude that the random variable Y and Z are independent.
Question 2
Statistics
X1
X2
N
Valid
5
5
Missing
4
4
Mean
6.00
5.60
Std. Deviation
3.162
2.302
Variance
10.000
5.300
Correlations
X1
X2
X1
Pearson Correlation
1
-.378
Sig. (2-tailed)
.531
N
5
5
X2
Pearson Correlation
-.378
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.531
N
5
5
Correlations
X1
X2
X1
Pearson Correlation
1
-.378
Sig. (2-tailed)
.531
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
40.000
-11.000
Covariance
10.000
-2.750
N
5
5
X2
Pearson Correlation
-.378
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.531
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
-11.000
21.200
Covariance
-2.750
5.300
N
5
5
Question 3
Statistics
Poverty
Diabetes
N
Valid
2719
2719
Missing
0
0
Mean
13.1374
7.8102
Std. Deviation
4.75502
2.76458
Variance
22.610
7.643
Correlations
Poverty
Diabetes
Poverty
Pearson Correlation
1
.408**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
6.145E4
1.458E4
Covariance
22.610
5.363
N
2719
2719
Diabetes
Pearson Correlation
.408**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
1.458E4
2.077E4
Covariance
5.363
7.643
N
2719
2719
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
One of the many paradoxes of the incomprehensible world economy today is that while hunger is spreading, in some parts of the developing world's poor struggle with another form of malnutrition: obesity and its devastating consequences of metabolic. Study of seven Latin American and Caribbean cities, coordinated by the Pan American Health Organization in 2000-2001, showed that from 45 to 72% of adults 60 and older had an increased body mass index. The prevalence of hypertension ranged from 44 to 54% and diabetes 13 to 22%. These conditions affect both rich: research in Peru, for example, found little difference between the upper and lower socioeconomic groups in terms of prevalence of hypertension and obesity. But the poor are suffering from the metabolic consequences: women in the lower third of the distribution of SES were four times more frequently than in the upper third to have abnormally high blood sugar on an empty stomach, and men in the lower third of the violations were twice rate of those at the top.
In this issue, education and counseling of patients, arm and his colleagues from the Centro de Investigación EN Alimentacion y Desarrollo (Center for Food and Development) in Sonora, a report on a small study in which they tried to change dietary habits and exercise medium low and low- income Mexicans with type 2 diabetes. They used a family ecological model, inviting diabetics and their families in a number of small groups in which they attempted to education and problem solving on how to eat better and increase physical activity. Requirements of the intervention were modest part in five sessions over 8 months. The results were disappointing in many respects.
First, the family members showed low levels of knowledge about diabetes, and apparently little inclination to learn more. First of all, 49 diabetic patients participated, it was only 38 relatives. Only three families participated in three or more sessions (compared to 30 out of 49 diabetics). Secondly, there was little effect of intervention on risk factors or diet. This may not be surprising, given the relatively low intensity intervention, but what participants said about their experience is revealing and important. In this poor, marginally employed, the minimum treatment of diabetes mellitus alone (not including any complications or conditions often associated) are estimated to cost between $ 650 and US $ 1200 per ...