SOCIAL MODEL OF DISABILITY

Social Model of Disability

Social Model of Disability

Introduction

The disability social model provides us with the equipments not only to confront the prejudice and discrimination the individuals encounter, but also to enunciate the personal impairment experiences. Acknowledging the differences is hence a vital component of the affirmation of the humanity and of a belief and ethical care which highlights our civil right and privileges (Bailey and Hall, 1992, 67-90).

The disability social model has come to be known as the big idea of the movement of disability. The model was formulated in 1970s by UPIAS (Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation) activists. The model achieved the academic credibleness thru the works of Colin Barnes (1991), Vic Finkelstein and most chiefly Mike Oliver. The disability social model is now considered as the ideological acid test of impairment politics, employed by the individuals' disable movements to differentiate among laws, policies, and organizations, liberal and even inadequate ideas (Amundsen, 1992, 18-105).

Social Model of Disability

Therefore, the disability social model comprises of various chief components. It states that people who are disabled are the part of the demoralized social group. It differentiates among the individuals' impairments which they have, and the repressiveness experienced by them (Barnes, 1999, 577-580). And more significantly, it determines disability as the societal repressiveness, but not the impairment form. Some activists and theorists have also formulated a social approach to define the individuals' disability that comprises the first two components. Nevertheless, as demonstrated by the US phrase of 'people with disabilities', these views have not proceeded a long way in re-defining disability as social oppressiveness as the disability social model of British. Rather, the approach of the North Americans have chiefly formulated the individuals' belief of people with disability as a minority group, within the custom of political opinions of the US. Although the works of Wendell (1996), Davis (1995), Rioux et al (1994), Amundsen (1992), Albrecht (1992), and Hahn explored the crucial cultural, social and political disability proportions, some debate that no one has established a solid differentiation among social disabilities and biological impairments that are the chief elements of the social model of disability in British (Barnes, 1999, 577-580).

The community of disability is one of the biggest groups of minorities, who are exposed to social isolation and segregation, most often drove into unemployment, social isolation and poverty through reliance on the country (Abberley, 1987, 5-20). This is the result of systemic discrimination, and is being challenged by the disability social model that outlines disabilities as a creation of politics: it proposes the discrimination, segregation and barriers shaped by the society (intentionally or unintentionally) are the crucial components which define disability. The social model empowers individuals with disability to disassemble obstacles as to provide them with flexibility, choices, and power to achieve the equality, solidarity, dignity, and autonomy linked with civil rights and nationality, and demands to explore that takes an approach of emancipator and has a political dedication to face segregation and repression (Bauman, 1992, ...