Property and designing in PracticE

Property and Planning in Practice

Property and Planning in Practice

Introduction

Compulsory land acquisition was necessary, but controversial field of government at sub-national and national levels, and in recent years has increased in several developed and developing countries. Traditionally, the field of government for the provision of public infrastructure to meet the needs of society, of "public purposes" are presented in both State and Commonwealth legislation around the UK and abroad.

Not clearly defined in the various legislation, for which purchased the land may be supplied in accordance with its use as a public utility or, more specifically, what public purpose is. This paper is criticism of public policy objectives and analyzes the border and recent attempts to establish and strengthen the capacity of the degree of this rule in the legislation in the UK and internationally. Local and international examples are used to highlight the extent to which this rule evolved without the necessary legislation and the issues of unlimited expansion potential, which can be objective. Framework has been developed to provide alternative assessment of compensation, taking into account existing constraints and limitations of Pointe Gourde principle in the development of compensation.

Discussion

Land use rights and land tenure

In understanding the perception of land use and its relation to the compulsory acquisition, among other issues that may affect it, freehold title to land may represent most of the absolute interest in land, and perhaps seen as a set of rights and privileges. It was at this point that the perception of property ownership may depart from the understanding of many of those who hold an interest in it. "The lawful concept of house does not signify substantial or intangible things that are called property in commonplace speech. Rather, the property as a legal concept that refers to the rights and interests in such facilities" (Youngman 1993:76). This point of view Youngman starts to analyze and distinguish what is actually spent as opposed to freehold, which gives the right to land for use or do with their land, thus, further defining their interests.

More than just a law and the law, the properties of a variety of complex rights and duties, which focus on those responsibilities and the warnings may well determine the awareness and value of freehold. Allen (2000) discusses the importance of the state to be able to acquire the necessary property, land tax and regulate its use. To do this, coexisting with the perception of absolutism in property rights is a legitimate government to regulate, acquire and control land use.

The numbers 1 conceptual models of conventional and unconventional perception of fee simple ownership and the fact that these interests may be perceived in the mind. In Figure 1, the traditional perception of fee simple fee simple ranks of the above interests to the interests of the Government, taxation, regulating the use and acquisition of land. In this model, purchasing land is regarded as a government impost. In comparison, Figure 2 highlights the Government's right to tax and regulate the use and ...