Policy of Gay Marriages

Policy of Gay Marriages

Introduction: Issue, Policy, Problem

The report focuses on the policy analysis. I have chosen the policy related to 'gay marriages'. The main aim of this report is to critically analyze the policies related top gay marriages along with the constitutional views. There are several laws that are implemented and rejected in the US constitutions regarding gay and same sex marriages. The fact that gay Americans are not allowed to legalize their relationships in the same way that heterosexual Americans can is a travesty of justice gay rights activists say. By pressing to marry along with the right to be free from government harassment in their own homes. Gay rights advocates say that they are not asking for any specific treatment (Wilson 2003). Rather, they contend, they want to be able to count on all of the rights that most respectable Americans take for granted.

In terms of the right to marry, policy say, there is no reason why gays should not be able to form a bond. It is very difficult for anyone to understand the main position and background of the gay marriages. According to Anthony Wilson Smith, gays does not want government money, preferring status, jobs that other needs from government (Wilson 2003). They only need the official and legal right for the gay marriages or the same sex marriages. According to gay and lesbians, any couple who love each other have to be legally liable for the gay marriages because they need to declare their commitments. They need a right by which they can live together and get marry. According to policy, they need only their rights from the government. They want to live with each other by ignoring the sex.

Conservatives, by and large, oppose allowing gay marriage, supporters note. By doing so, they ask, are they not contradicting their conservative position, which places a high premium on marriage? Conversation has been long to argue about the rights of their marriages. They need to foster the responsibility, commitment and the domestication of the uncontrollable desire.

Main area of concern for gay rights activists has been the sodomy laws that they say unfairly target their reclusive behavior. The Lawrence decision has rendered laws specifically targeting gays illegal. Although those laws were rarely enforced, their symbolism made important to overturn, activists assert. The promotion or the existence of these laws in any society was a justification for harassing and discriminating the label liability of their rights. Because, it is the primary form of the physical deviance and criminal attitude (Sullivan 2003). Supporters say that the language of the Lawrence ruling as much as the ruling itself was a substantial victory. In the court's majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy defended the right of gays to live their lives in private.

History and Scope of Issue

The 1950s and 1960s saw the birth of the civil rights movement, in which African-Americans struggled to assert their full rights as Americans. Some say that two recent events, one abroad and one in ...