Pay and Rewards As Motivators in Hospitals: Analysis of UK's Healthcare Management Practices
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1
Background1
Problem statement2
Purpose2
Research Aims and Objectives2
Research Questions3
Significance3
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW4
Importance of Motivation4
Theory of rewards4
Social-Cognitive Approach to Study of Rewards4
Basic Psychological Needs Theory (BPNT)6
Cognitive Evaluation Theory (CET)7
Goal Contents Theory (GCT)8
Organismic Integration Theory (OIT)9
Causality Orientations Theory (COT)10
Self-Determination Theory and Rewards11
The Social-Cognitive Perspective11
Pay and Attrition12
Rewards and Job Satisfaction15
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY17
Introduction17
Classification of Research Methods17
Multi-method studies17
Mixed method studies17
Research Philosophies18
Qualitative and Quantitative approach19
Deductive and inductive approach19
Subjective and objective approach20
Steps in Primary Methodology21
Strength and weakness of the mixed research22
Strengths22
Weaknesses22
Instrument for data collection23
Sample23
Limitations23
Internal Validity23
Construct Validity24
CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION25
Questionnaire analysis25
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION38
REFERENCES43
APPENDICES49
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Background
The more an employee is engaged, the more likely he or she is to focus on value-enhancing behaviors to the organization (O?Neal & Gebauer, 2006). A recent 2005 Towers Perrin global workforce study of 86,000 employees from mid- and large companies in 16 countries across four continents show 84% of the study's highly engaged employees believe they can positively impact the quality of their work product, compared with 32% of disengaged employees and 62% of moderately engaged employees (O?Neal & Gebauer, 2006). Highly engaged employees think they are important and essential and are willing and eager to contribute. The study also showed a relationship between employee engagement and retention. Among engaged employees, 59% say they are committed to stay with their employer compared with only 24% of disengaged employees (O?Neal & Gebauer, 2006).
Employee engagement is driven by rewards other than compensation and typically vary based on where an individual is in his or her career (Jesuthasan, 2003). Work-life programs that support the needs of employees at different stages of the life-cycle are linked to increased employee satisfaction, engagement, and increased OCB resulting in employees who perform at a higher level and beyond the traditional elements of the job (Lambert, 2000). A direct link exists between employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, company financial performance, and increased shareholder value. A 2001 Towers Perrin study found a positive correlation between employee engagement and financial indicators such as revenue growth, cost of goods sold, and operating margin (Jesuthasan, 2003)
Problem statement
Both basic and applied research studies have been conducted to examine the effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation, competence, autonomy, and achievement. By definition, basic research seeks to understand the theoretical basis of specific phenomena in more controlled settings whereas applied research seeks to examine the phenomena in more naturalistic or less controlled settings (Israkson, 2008). Information gathered from basic and applied research studies on rewards and specific variables (i.e. intrinsic motivation, achievement, etc.) have added valuable information to the field of motivational psychology and health care. Nevertheless, there are numerous shortcomings within this body of research on rewards, most significantly related to the issue of settings and field studies (Schepers 2005).
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine how UK hospital uses pay and rewards to motivate staff. The pay and rewards are important determinants for reducing attrition and increasing employee engagement.
Research Aims and Objectives
The aim of this research is to study the impact of ...