MEASURING AND REGULATING HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES

Measuring and Regulating Health Care in the United States



Measuring and Regulating Health Care in the United States

Introduction

Within the wellbeing care arena there is a growing concern about the desires of the elderly. Families marvel if their loved ones are getting the proper care that they need with the growing costs of health care and the decreasing assets of prime care physicians it is dreaded that only the personal needs of the patient are contacted (Starr 1982). Concerns increase about the social psychological and environmental desires or the elderly. Astudy by Barbara Berkman and aides tries to supply some responses to persons concerned with this issue According to the study numerous people are not cognizant of the communal services they may have available to them. Because of this, many elderly people are not getting the care they need outside of the physical care necessary to "live." (Mahar 2006) It is felt that screening a patient for social or emotional needs is becoming increasingly important.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire to identify the psychological, communal and ecological desires of elderly perseverings. Three hospitals from different geographic positions were chosen for this study. At each hospital a care coordinator was selected to be to blame for questionnaire reconsider, communication with physicians, and farther assessment and intervention when deemed necessary. Lists of patients 65 and older were generated from the caseloads of primary care physicians from the three hospital sites (Christensen 2009). The questionnaires were mailed out with physicians cover notes and permission types in the summer of 1993. In the questionnaire patients were inquired to assess their self-percieved notions of there health and psychosocial needs, as well as the grade of their functioning. Upon reciept of the accomplished questionnaires the care coordinators from each hospital consider the results of the survey. Those patients considered as being high risk received pursue up teletelephone calls. Depending on the situation, high risk patients were granted information only, indirect referrals, or direct referrals. The findings for the study indicate that approximately 56% of all people surveyed were in need of intervention (Starr 1982).

The three highest relation dangers for all three sights were: adversity with food groundwork, adversity in doing house work, and difficulty getting round the home. All three hospital backgrounds acquiesce that patients who described having problems in the survey were judged to need intervention more than those who did not report having problems. Although the study had good intentions, I seem the study was unclear in its objectives. The study was to conceive an evaluation device that would recognise the psychosocial and environmental needs of aged patients. Clearly the questionnaire did identify these needs. What is unclear is the reason of suggesting a questionnaire. Is this a first time try to assess the psychosocial and ecological desires of the aged, or is it an enhancement on past evaluation tools? (Mahar 2006) The study appears to present a new assessment procedure rather ...