GAY MALE COUPLES WHO ADOPT

Gay Male Couples Who Adopt

Gay Male Couples Who Adopt

Objective

To analyze and recognise key points and guidance for sophisticated perform psychiatric mental wellbeing nurses considering multicultural awareness involved in counseling gay-male couples who explore or exercise their right to adopt and raise children.

 

Discussion

A number of social and contemporary issues dispute gay-male couples who adopt. In the heterosexual family, adopting the progeny is stressful enough, and involves changes in the economic, heritage, and family system expectations. For gay-male couples, there is the similar stress, but it is additionally compounded by societal trends that make adoption difficult. As they start the process to adopt, gay-male couples often recognize their own worry of confronting the historical tenets and contemporary trends of heterosexism, homophobic fears, oppression, and the general stigma that surrounds gay-male couples. Many gay-male couples can advantage from psychotherapeutic intervention that explicates and explores these issues, identifies adaptive methods of coping and approach, as well as obtaining support and guidance, and otherwise normalizing the issues they face.

Allowing gay males to wed and raise the family continues to be the controversial issue. There are arguments in support of stopping gay males from adopting children. The most common contention is that gay males have an agenda to leverage their young children to become gay. Others contend that gay-male couples have poorer than mean parenting skills, relation to acknowledged social norms. There are others who question the mental wellbeing of gay male because of their sexual orientation. Another assertion is that young children raised by gay males are more probable to be suicidal (Cochran & Mays, 2000). These arguments are well publicized, albeit poorly empirically evidenced in research and publications reviews.

According to the publications, there are terms that emerge ambiguous and are characterised distinctly counting on the heritage and religious lenses applied. To provide clarification an operational definition of each of these terms is provided. Homosexual behavior is understood as sexual behavior occurring between two members of the same species and gender (Spitzer, 2003). Sexual orientation is characterised as sexual attraction, affection, and erotic behavior that are extracted in one gender by the same or opposite gender (Spitzer). Heterosexism is the system of beliefs that provides the rationale to discriminate against any sexual orientation other than heterosexuality. Homophobia is the psychopathology characterised by an genuine worry of homosexuals. Sexual stigma is the contradictory community-shared conviction for any no heterosexual behavior, persona, relationship, or community.

 

Results or Main Findings

Sexual Orientation: Development in Terms of Nature versus Nurture

The pervasive stereotype and assertion that gay males have an agenda to raise young children in an environment that promotes only homosexual orientation is based on significant supposition and assumption. The supposition is that sexual orientation is the choice that can be leveraged by the nurturing from the parent. Another supposition is that gay males can biologically procure actuality, significance that the majority of gay males are offspring of heterosexuals. Nevertheless, this brings up the following question: Is being gay the choice, or is being gay biologically predetermined?

To designated ...