Absorption costing method is used by the firms when they prepare financial statements for external purposes. One of the major aims of this costing system is that unit produced as well as inventory should incorporate a share of all production costs, both variable as well as fixed cost, arise while getting them to current position. The preparation of company's profit statement based on absorption costing system for the months Jan-Mar & Apr-Jun are given below.
Working 1: Full Production Cost
Direct material
30
Direct labour
65
Variable production o/h
15
Fixed production o/h
5.000
Full production cost
115.000
Working 2: Value of Inventory & Production
Opening Inv. (Units*Full Cost)
Production (Units*Full Cost)
Closing Inventory (Units*Full Cost)
Jan-Mar
- 9,200, 000 1,150, 000
Apr-Jun
1,150,000 8,050, 000 -
Working 3: Under/over absorbed fixed production overhead
Jan-Mar
Apr-Jun
Actual fixed prod o/h
500, 000 500, 000
Prod*Fix o/h cost
400, 000 350, 000
Expected - Actual
100, 000 150, 000
Fixed o/h absorbed
500, 000/100, 000
500, 000/150, 000
(Under absorbed)
(Under absorbed)
Absorption Costing Profit Statement
Jan-Mar
Jan-March
Apr-Jun
Apr-Jun
Sales
9,100, 000 9,100, 000
Less cost of sales
Opn. Inv
- 1,150, 000
Prod
9,200, 000 8,050, 000
Closing Inv
(1,150,000)
(8,050,000)
- (9,200,000)
(Under)/over absorbed fixed prod o/h
(100,000)
(150,000)
Gross Profit
950,000 (250,000)
Less Expenses
Variable selling & Distr. Cost
700, 000 700, 000
Fixed Adm.
60, 000 60, 000
Fixed selling & Distribution
25, 000 (785, 000)
25, 000 (785, 000)
Net Profit
1,735, 000 535, 000
Marginal Costing
Companies use marginal costing system in order to facilitate internal decision making (short-term). This costing method is aimed to identify the contribution that has been generated (sales less variable costs), since fixed costs are arise despite the level of activity. Company's profit statement account based on marginal costing system is given below.
Working 1: Full Production Cost
Direct material
30
Direct labour
65
Variable production o/h
15
Full production cost
110.000
Working 2: Value of Inventory & Production
Opening Inv. (Units*Full Cost)
Production (Units*Full Cost)
Closing Inventory (Units*Full Cost)
Jan-Mar
- 8,800, 000 1,100, 000
Apr-Jun
1,100,000 7,700, 000 -
Marginal Costing Profit Statement
Jan-Mar
Jan-March
Apr-Jun
Apr-Jun
Sales
7,700, 000 7,700, 000
Less Variable Cost
Opn. Inv
- 1,150, 000
Prod
9,200, 000 8,050, 000
Closing Inv
1,150, 000 (10,350, 000)
- (9,200, 000)
Variable selling & Distr. Cost
(700, 000)
(700, 000)
Contribution
(3,350, 000)
(2,200, 000)
Less Fixed Cost
Fixed o/h
500, 000
500, 000
Fixed Adm. 60, 000 60, 000
Fixed selling & Distribution
25, 000 (585, 000)
25, 000 (585, 000)
Net Profit
(2,765, 000)
(1,615, 000)
Difference in Profit Figures
The profit figures calculated under both methods i.e. absorption costing as well as marginal costing are both difference, which is because of the fixed production overheads treatment in both methods. In marginal costing system the fixed production overhead's full amount is written off in the period that it occurs, on the other hand, in absorption costing system fixed production overheads' part is carried among accounting periods as share of inventory valuations.
Task 2: Dynasty Limited
Variety of techniques is available for capital investment appraisal, including net present value (NPV), payback period, internal rate of return (IRR), and some others. Most used techniques are net present value and payback period; therefore we have evaluated the given ...