EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT

Evaluation Assignment

Evaluation Assignment

The core purpose of this paper is to execute statistical analysis of on the data file designed to analyze the data of the sample size used for this paper. The analysis of this paper compared two designs of systems in order to interpret whether the contemporary system design is better from the previous design or not. In order to gather the data for analysis a system prototype was provided to 10 users that comprised the sample size of the analysis. There was a task assigned to the sample for the analysis in which they were asked to use each system to plan the planting of their small garden and to use it for one season's growing. After accumulation of data from the sample, it was analyzed that there are several factors through which the contemporary system design can be contrasted from the old design. The variables used to contrast the contemporary system design from the old one are enlightened below:

System Attractiveness

Better Planning Executed through System

System to be More Enjoyable

Total Time Taken on System

Serious Errors Executed on the System

Descriptive Analysis

According to the descriptive analysis of the data accumulated from the sample of 10 users selected for this survey, it can be interpreted that 20% of the sample strongly agree that system 1 is attractive, 20% agreed, 20% mildly agreed and another 20% revealed neutral response. Hence, it can be interpreted that system 1 is attractive.

Attractiveness of System1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Mildly disagree

1

20.0

20.0

20.0

Neutral

1

20.0

20.0

40.0

Mildly agree

1

20.0

20.0

60.0

Agree

1

20.0

20.0

80.0

Strongly agree

1

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

5

100.0

100.0

According to the descriptive analysis of the data accumulated from the sample of 10 users selected for this survey, it can be interpreted that 20% of the sample agreed that system 2 is attractive, 40% mildly agreed and 40% revealed neutral response. Hence, it can be interpreted that system 1 is more attractive that system 2 as majority of the recorded responses witness this.

Attractiveness of System 2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Neutral

2

40.0

40.0

40.0

Mildly agree

2

40.0

40.0

80.0

Agree

1

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

5

100.0

100.0

According to the descriptive analysis of the data accumulated from the sample of 10 users selected for this survey, it can be interpreted that 60% of the sample mildly disagree the statement that system 1 can be used for better planning and 20% disagreed; nonetheless, 20% revealed neutral response. Hence, it can be interpreted that system 1 cannot be used for better planning.

Better Planning of System 1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

1

20.0

20.0

20.0

Mildly disagree

3

60.0

60.0

80.0

Neutral

1

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

5

100.0

100.0

According to the descriptive analysis of the data accumulated from the sample of 10 users selected for this survey, it can be interpreted that 60% of the sample mildly disagree the statement that system 2 can be used for better planning and 20% disagreed; nonetheless, 20% revealed neutral response. Hence, it can be interpreted that the results does not favour both system prototypes; however, the analysis enlightens that system 2 can offer better planning as compared to system 1.

Better Planning of System 2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Strongly disagree

1

20.0

20.0

20.0

Disagree

1

20.0

20.0

40.0

Mildly disagree

3

60.0

60.0

100.0

Total

5

100.0

100.0

According to the descriptive analysis of the data accumulated from the sample of 10 users selected for this survey, it can be interpreted that 40% of the sample mildly agreed the statement that system ...