ETHICS OF RESEARCH

Ethical principles for researchers and evaluators

About the paper

.

The paper enlists the requirements of the person who evaluates the research for MICHEV program, and therefore, it proposes the list of all the aspects of the researcher's job.

MICHEV program

The picture encompasses of the idea of the development of sound health of the mothers, as well as, the baby through the development of the scenario that has led to complexities of the health of mothers for the few days in the past. The paper explains how people working for MICHEV conduct research, as well as, abide by the ethical paradigms of research, the rationale is because of the idea that it investigates how MICHEV could be further integrated with effectiveness and efficiency through the ethics of research, the rationale is about the development of the entire scenario that could be more of a productive and developmental intitate, and leads to the development of the ways new things are done.

The job of the researcher adds enormously to the he program, since it develops the whole scenario of the enhancement of the health standards provided by the program, as well as, the development of the whole scenario.

The job of evaluators and researchers encompasses of the very significant ethical paradigm. The ethics of the job of a researcher and evaluator are discussed as under;

Systematic enquiry

The foremost of the ethical obligations encompass of the systematic enquiry. The ethical standard demands for ensuring that the idea of the research is based upon the notion, the whole picture is about;

To determine the accuracy and credibility of the information that has to be found, the information has to be extracted from reliable sources.

He has to explore the relevant questions pertaining to the research, as well as, to explore the answers to related to these questions.

He has to evaluate the accuracy of methods and approaches that are available for the research that are more appropriate and relevant in case of the subject (AEA, 2004).

Competence

The researcher and evaluator have to be competent enough to understand and evaluate the subject, as well as, its complexities. The competence has four dimension; they are

He should possess relevant knowledge and skills

To be able to ensure that the interpretation of the content is accurate, correct and reliable.

There has to be full implication of the professional training and competence.

They have to be in a consistent ...