EGG OIL ARE ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORIST

Egg oil is environmental terrorist

Egg oil is environmental terrorist

Sally is liable for committing acts of terrorism. Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides the elements of terrorism. There is a threat or use of action to threaten or influence the public or government or to advance a political, religious or ideological cause. Terrorism is defined by the existence of several elements. There is terrorism if the action involves using firearms or explosives. A terrorist act involves an action against the UK government in behalf or for the interest of a proscribed organization.

The prosecution may consider Sally's action as acts of terrorism because placement of explosives in a public place was intended to threaten the authorities. There was also loss of life and damage to property resulting from the action. (Stewart

127) The action was against the UK government in behalf of Sally's organization, which is assumed to be proscribed since the organization is described as extremist or radical. On the part of prosecution, there is culpability because the defendant had the intention to threaten authorities and actualized this threat by the actus reus of spray paint in the Central Egg oil company threatening the company and the destruction of public property. The defendant also had the ability to perceive and be aware of the risks due to his state of mind. In his own words, Sally admitted that she has an irresistible impulse to damage and the company in a public is one way of killing. Sally may provide the defense that he warned the police about the fire giving them enough time to find and defuse prosecute.

The defendant may claim that there was no intention to harm people or cause damage property. However, under the Terrorism Act 2000, terrorism involves a threat or use of action that creates a serious risk on the health and life of people or cause serious violence against a person or serious damage to property. Even if Sally intended for the police to find and detonate the fire, placing the fire in a public place created the risk to the health and lives of people and risk of damaging property. (Leigh Recklessness after Reid 208)The perception and awareness of these risks makes his actions knowing acts. Thus, Sally has committed acts of terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000. The terrorist acts committed by Sally are punishable under existing penal laws. Sally's action resulted to the death of one person and injury to another person. Sally is liable for murder for the death of Bill and serious injuries to Claude. Lord Chief Justice Coke proposed the definition “Murder is when a man of sound memory, and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the king's peace, with malice aforethought, either expressed by the party or implied by law, so as the party wounded, or hurt die of the wound or hurt within a year and a day ...