Critique Paper

Critique Paper

Critique on 1st Article

In the 1st article my friend agrees that both of these men affirm and defend Trinitarianism. Gregory of Nazianzus's orations stand as Apologetic responses to the corruptive anti-Trinitarian theology promoted by fellow theologians of his era.

While, in my opinion, it is intriguing to observe in St. Gregory's 31st lecture to a definite account of his Oneness of God philosophy, and besides, what appears to essentially be his guarding nullification of and often forceful reaction to imputations, contentions, and philosophical positions of his unacknowledged religious and philosophical adversaries? I considered it both enthralling and difficult to peruse this speech, yet I did study a couple things that help me in my particular manners of thinking noticing Trinitarian religious philosophy and the part of the Holy Spirit.

In Oration 31:2, the Holy Spirit is exhibited as blessed and the God-head as blessed in light of the sacred Spirit, in 31:3, the God-head is presented in the light of the Spirit, in 31:4 the Holy Spirit is displayed as prior dependent upon the Gregory's statement that the Spirit has constantly been part of the God-head and since God is earlier then it takes after that the Son and the Holy Spirit are as well pre-existent since you wouldn't be able to have a Trinitarian perspective of God that is one or two part prior and one or two part make and limited. Gregory states one of his for the most part significant focuses noticing the honesty of the Spirit's place in the God-head when he states that the Spirit is none, of these ingenerate or conceived of God, yet rather “returns” from God significance he is none, of these made or born of God however is prior with God and has continuously been.

In this article it is quite ...