Criminal Intelligence



Criminal Intelligence

Introduction

The paper aims to emphasize on the application and implications of criminal intelligence analysis for the detection and reduction of violent criminals and their crimes. Criminal Intelligence and Analysis, as instruments of production knowledge also collect and process data, disseminate knowledge produced under the general name of reports, information and appreciation (Ronczkowski, 2004). Secrecy is one of the common characteristics of Intelligence and Analysis as well as several other behaviors typical of culture operational activity called Human Intelligence. In order to understand the Criminal Analysis in its coordination with Intelligence is need to understand it in a broader conceptual topological level. It in such topological level it is closely linked to the State Intelligence when is positioned with three other species Analysis: Intelligence Analysis itself, Operations Analysis and Investigative Analysis.

The idea of Criminal Intelligence is not too divergent from ante-exposed. The purpose of both is to obtain knowledge to influence the process decision-making for the benefit of society and the State. The largest differences are about the scope and the means employed by both. The police activity has peculiar nuances, whose explanation and discussion should be taken to academic centers, to popularize knowledge and integration between society and the police force (Tong et al, 2009).

However, the lack of the study and propagation of knowledge has caused the proliferation of misconceptions and inappropriate uses of expressions, regarding the Activity Intelligence and Investigation. It is in common use in serving police news in the media, the term intelligence, as if often synonymous with research. Actions taken under this lettering often come to demonstrate in public that institutions that do not have investigative powers have tried to fly the position that, for constitutional and legal order, is reserved for the Judicial Police. The minimum standards of training for police intelligence analysts need, therefore, to incorporate this new reality, because only then will it be possible to adopt the new conceptual model of intelligence that involves the fusion of information and modern philosophy of information sharing (Osborne & Wernicke, 2003). As a result, minimum training standards need to take into account this new context the work of intelligence analysts, context also in effect for all other members of the police and intelligence community users of its products.

Background

The proactive role of the intelligence analyst is now even more dynamic, in that it takes place a change of philosophy of knowledge management for ...