Court Managers

Read Complete Research Material

COURT MANAGERS

Court Managers

Abstract

In this research we try to discover the insight of “Court Managers” in a holistic perspective. The key heart of the study is on “Court Managers” and their role and types. The research also examines various characteristics of “Court Managers” and tries to measure their effect in society. Lastly the research illustrates a variety of factors which are responsible for “Court Managers” and tries to describe the overall effect of it.

Table of Contents

Introduction1

Discussion and Analysis1

The current delicate balance in the Supreme Court1

Supreme Court justice makes Conservative decisions2

Supreme Court justice makes Liberal decisions2

Hispanic support Elena Kagan as a judge of Supreme Court of United States2

Conclusion4

Court Managers

Introduction

The Founders envisioned the judiciary as "least dangerous branch" of government, but activist judges have turned the courts into organs of political action designed to exercise a vast power over virtually every aspect of American life. Instead of fulfilling their duty to interpret the Constitution and laws as they can be written, the judges try, increasingly, to impose their policy preferences to the nation. Recent examples includes, a federal judge can be supported by administrative decree rather than federal law, to overturn an Arizona law that unambiguously enforces immigration laws already on the books and another federal judge in California, that creates a constitutional right hitherto unknown to gay marriage.

Discussion and Analysis

The current delicate balance in the Supreme Court

Only four of the current nine justices have shown that they are usually loyal and consistent constitutionalists. The others are either liberal activist to the core or inconsistent in their approach. President Barack Obama will probably have a nominee to the Supreme Court more and more jobs for 50-60 federal circuits.

Supreme Court justice makes Conservative decisions

On the other hand, the impact of judicial attitudes in decision-making is significant; the Most of this research has focused on the political stance of the decision maker. The Judges of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have been studying, with results consistent finding that the political orientation of judges (as a belief system) is a good predictor of the process of decision making (e.g., conservative judges are likely conservative decisions). George (1998) used a popular method of study how the ideology of the Supreme Court influences decision-making. This method examined the correlations between the nature of liberal or conservative opinion and party president who appointed political justice.

Supreme Court justice makes Liberal decisions

In its unusual conformation, the Court ...
Related Ads