CASE STUDY: THEORIES OF MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP

Case Study: Theories of management and leadership



Case Study: Theories of management and leadership

Introduction

This is the first entry to explain the dominant prescriptive theory of leadership. The following sections comment on examples of business leadership, leadership ethics, methods of effective leadership, competing conceptions of leadership, the relationship between leadership and management, and the function of emotional intelligence and charisma.DiscussionsPrescriptive theory of leadership

Prescriptive theory emphasizes the good leadership as a process calculated from the leader to influence followers to achieve the honor improving social groups. Leadership in democratic societies must be "servant leadership", defined as a service on behalf of others. Or the success of social organization requires that managers with effective leadership and strong moral values, and wide dissemination of such skills and values in the sense of "empowerment" of followers. (Kouzes 2007)

A successful leader will enhance the welfare of the group, a successful leader is not. Measuring success is the legitimacy of the goals and defining a time horizon during which makes success. A competent leader is effective to influence followers. Ethical leadership means that individuals of high moral standards can pursue ethically desirable goals by ethically acceptable means. Unethical leadership involves a leader immoral or amoral, acting on purely personal benefit, regardless of the consequences for others.

An amoral man has no morals, no sense of right and wrong. An amoral leader only calculates yields and personal risks. An immoral person with low moral or corrupt behavior, an ethical leader can be effective in influence as a moral leader. An effective leader can be successful or not depends on circumstances beyond their control.

Prescriptive theory predicts that over time, moral leadership to overcome ethical leadership in terms of impact, effectiveness and successful outcome of the group.1880 William James essay on leadership makes a difference between leadership, in mind and action. Leadership action is an immediate effect. It occurs in response to existing conditions. Leadership action can be considered as direct action. A business executive is engaged in the direction of movement. Leadership has long term consequences and can be thought of as acting indirectly. An artist or the scientist is dedicated to thought leadership.

Leadership action occurs directly through formal or legal authority (i.e., control) or by informal (i.e., moral) authority in pairs, groups, teams, formal organizations or their subunits, communities and society. Formal leadership implies a position or office which remains the legal authority to act. Executives and managers hold such positions. Informal leadership can be exercised through informal person or group acting with moral authority. The formal leadership, an individual plays a socially recognized. Informal leadership, an individual establishes a paper accepted by others as legitimate. Informal leadership is based on persuasion, for example, or ideas.

The deliberate exercise of influence overlaps of many of the art of politics. Most of the leadership is essentially a political activity. Business leadership and management can be considered as participation in politics as much as is the behavior the ...