Question 1: Explain the difference between murder, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter
Voluntary manslaughter is when you consciously take actions that result in someone's death, but without malice of forethought. An example would be if you came home and found your spouse in bed with someone else, and in a sudden fit of rage, you grab a gun and kill them.
Involuntary manslaughter is when your actions are so negligent that it results in someone's death. The most common example would be if a drunk driver were to kill someone. It is sometimes called Negligent Homicide.
Murder is act of killing another human being, it is defined as the intention of killing by injuring body, with the express or implicitly, a use of deadly weapon will definitely result in an implication of court of law.
Question 2: Explain what is meant by corporate responsibility
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be characterised as the "economic, lawful, ethical, and discretionary anticipations that society has of associations at a granted issue in time". The notion of corporate social responsibility entails that associations have lesson, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities in supplement to their responsibilities to profit from an equitable come back for investors and obey with the law.
A customary outlook of the corporation proposes that its prime, if not sole, responsibility is to its proprietors, or stockholders. However, CSR needs associations to take up a broader outlook of its responsibilities that encompasses not only stockholders, but numerous other constituencies as well, encompassing workers, suppliers, clients, the localized community, localized, state, and government authorities, environmental assemblies, and other exceptional concern groups (MANN, R. A., 2003 Pp.21-31).
Corporate accountability is a base of corporate social responsibility. Corporate social responsibilities, at the most general grade, encompass financial obligations, lawful and regulatory compliance, responsiveness to ethical norms, and discretionary social welfare contributions.
Question 3: Explain what is meant by corporate manslaughter
The new offense of corporate manslaughter is committed when the organization committed a "flagrant violation" of a "relevant duty of care", leading to the death of a person. This recent change in corporate law and health and safety law means it will no longer be necessary to identify an individual director guilty of gross negligence; all that is needed is a management of the organization or serious defect causing death (CHEESEMAN, H. R. 2010 Pp. 127-133).
The Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act introduce the new offense in the UK wide, and is the result of a realization that the common law principles of manslaughter (which deal with people) not cover the continuation of business (FRANCIONI, F 2011 Pp. 75-99).
Manslaughter and act of corporate homicide, explain that all companies need to take a look at their current safety and health rules, if they don't want to bear potential humiliation and unlimited fine from legal authorities.
Organizations must prepare for the evolution of health and safety law and corporate law provides a complete review of management systems by securing the systems and implementing those systems practically. This implementation process will definitely result in a cost, although ...