Animal Testing

Introduction

The declaration that “animals have privileges” is one that very couple of people will contradict with. There are those, although, who glimpse animal cruelty as a form of entertainment. The ethical question then arises asks whether the “cruelty” against an animal can be benefited for humans or should humans benefit from themselves (Miller, 102-147).

Disagreement with the Animal Testing

It is apparent that the human rush is at the pinnacle of creation as they have achieved progressive heights that cannot be agreed by any other species. Unfortunately, animal research has been a basic part of their proceeded progress. Since Aristotle, animals have been utilised utilized for the benefit of humans. The question of why this has appeared for some time is because they had no other alternate than direct human testing. Man has come a long way and must find seek other testing techniques that are advanced in order to eliminate this harmful practice (Miller, 102-147).

One possibility is from lecturer Joordens in which he indicates that humans should check on humans who have the desired disease. This would convey about larger considered as experiments would encompass a greater significance to them.

Pro-test activists believe that the use of animals for product testing is good rather than to experiment on a human being. As a matter of fact, when a manufactured product is being tested on an animal for side affects is not risky in anyway for a human being. Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all newly developed drugs, both over-the-counter and prescription, be tested on animals before being approved for human consumption. Delmas Luedke argues that “Using animals in carefully controlled and monitored studies not only can achieve this goal, but also minimizes total suffering (Luedke, 31). He states many prospective medications are found ...