Academic Standards

Background of Study

According to the information provided by Wikipedia, regarding the standards and the expectation of students, in year 2000 about 76.6 million students enrolled in Kindergarten and studied till gradation, out of them 72 percent student, aged 12 to 17 were observed to be on tract academically with respect to their age. The market expectation regarding the knowledge and education of students are much high relating to the education and knowledge teaching in the class.

Rationale

The major issue in schools is mainly because of the unconvinced benefits and education teachers are giving in the class. These education standards are not up to mark in order to make the bright student level.

Problem Statement

The teachers are unable to teach value learning to the student mainly because of the teacher-student ration in the class. The schools lack quality teachers, which results in providing value learning. The knowledge that is taught in the class is also not innovative. Teachers more believes in one-size-fit all model for all strength.

Aims & Objectives

The aim of research is to discuss about the reason relating to short supply of teachers in schools and the reason behind the students uncompetitive values learning.

Significance

The major significance of this study will help in understanding the school psychology and helping out the way to find better reason for enhancing the student academic standards, in order to be competitive enough to compete with different talents in the market.

Study Questions

Are today's standards and expectations held high enough?

Are young students prepared for the 'real world' after graduation?

Ethical Concern

One profound moral issue that action researchers, like other scientists, cannot evade is the use they make of knowledge that has been generated during inquiry. For this fundamental ethical reason, the premises of any study—but particularly those of action research—must be transparent. Moreover, they must attend to a wider range of questions regarding intent and purpose than simply those of validity and reliability. These questions might include considerations such as the following:

Why was this topic chosen?

How and by whom was the research funded?

To what extent does the topic dictate or align with methodology?

Are issues of access and ethics clear?

From what foundations are the definitions of science and truth derived?

How are issues of representation, validity, bias, and reliability discussed?

What is the role of the research? In what ways does this align with the purpose of the study?

In what ways will this study contribute to knowledge and understanding?

A defensible understanding of what constitutes knowledge and of the accuracy with which it is portrayed must be able to withstand reasonable scrutiny from different perspectives. Given the complexities of human nature, complete understanding is unlikely to result from the use of a single research methodology. Ethical action researchers will make public the stance and lenses they choose for studying a particular event. With transparent intent, it is possible to honor the unique, but not inseparable, domains inhabited by social and natural, thereby accommodating appreciation for the value of multiple perspectives of the human experience.

Literature Review

Academic research is ...