Topic: Organization Theory

Organization Theory

It has been said that the classical approach to organizational design and management is not appropriate for the needs of modern day organizations.

Introduction

In the immense competition being faced by organizations in the modern world, they need to be very proactive and careful in choosing a management approach for the organization's success and accomplishment. We shall discuss in the following content whether the classical approach to organizational design and management is still relevant for upcoming organizations or not.

Arguments for the statement

Organizations countering competition should take immense care of various arrays of management to effectively achieve in the long run. They should evaluate their leadership style, motivational factors, and the significance of informal relationships. The classical theory of organization experiences lack of realism in terms of issues faced by huge competitive organizations. Taylor and other theorists of scientific management expressed it to be a value free unity force that possibly will bring about a complete managerial revolution. On the other hand, the existing assets of organizational change countering open ended competitive opposition do not accept the theory of scientific management. Organizations countering competitive situations should have good management labor relationships to enhance productivity. They should together work towards execution of social and financials needs which was something that had been totally overlooked in the scientific management approach (Pfeffer, 1997).

The classical theory has detained the trial of several confusions in the changes that have multiplied in organization management. The present organizations in the private and the public sector are countering an atmosphere which may not seem to be favorable to their constitution as they are deeply rooted on the classical theory principles. The classical school of thought expanded and followed the progress of a universal ideology that could be easily applied to all situations in every organization (Hatch, 1997). The classical theorists envisioned organizations as regular devices to accomplish organization's aims and objectives. This particular theory mainly stands on the three assumptions given below:

The affiliation amidst the employees and the management is defined through a formal, systematic communication procedure in which every task is well defined, there is accountability of everything, and systematic routes are practiced to avoid any sort of clash in the relationship.

Employees are treated as a monetary man who can be geared up through money only.

Thirdly, workers are considered as a product which lead to effective means of production (Wren, & Bendein, 2009). .

Classical theorists pictured organization as a closed system subjective to particular incontrovertible laws applicable in its management and structure. In the classical approach, people were not considered a significant component of production. The theorists have limited them theory intimately to the instrument of authority and have failed to deal with other vital factors associated to the performance of the organization. One major issue regarding the classical theory of organization is that it addresses a particular feature of human behavior but there is not much importance given to it.

Criticisms have also reviewed that the classical leaders completely ignored the behavioral aspect of an organization and also ...