Question 1: How do the passengers in the train, the fat man and the bundled fat woman each both express and hide their grief? Support from the text
The article depicts a time when a homeland is at conflict, and we glimpse the parents of young children who are going off to conflict packed into a little train car.
What starts off as a pleasant sufficient consideration rapidly turns into a spitting challenge, where each man endeavors to best the other ones by considering his own suffering? One man has had his child at the front since the outbreak of the war, while another's son has been injured on 3 distinct events, and dispatched back just as many times. We glimpse yet another man who begins to converse in numbers, that is to use numbers and calculations to display the he bears more because of his multiple children fighting.
Here we arrive to the first statement we can draw from War about the human condition. We recognize that, in a way alike to Thomas Hobbes, humans are naturally selfish, and it is our gut feeling to trial and best each other, even in times of large communal strife.
However, we then glimpse a fat traveler go in the carriage, and he only mixes up the argument more. He makes fanciful proclamations about how children are not the house of parents; neither should they be treated as such.
This prompts a traveler to hasten to acquiesce with the boisterous man, and we glimpse that he is a minor bit intimidated. He, although, proceeds off on a tangent about how children pertains to the Nation, and it is only the desire of the Nation that propel the activities of children.