How can teachers effectively support at-risk students who struggle with literacy?
Abstract
This dissertation is based on the topic of “How can teachers effectively support at-risk students who struggle with literacy?” The first chapter provides an introduction to the topic including the purpose and significance of the study. The second chapter covers the methodology for this study, followed by the findings in the third chapter. The discussion of findings is presented in the fourth chapter. The fifth chapter concludes the dissertation, providing implications and useful recommendations for further research.
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT2
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION5
Background5
Purpose5
Problem Statement6
Objectives6
Research Question6
Significance7
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY8
Literature Selection Criteria10
Search Technique10
Keywords Used10
Theoretical Framework10
CHAPTER 3: FINDINGS12
At-Risk Outcomes12
Absences12
Grade Retention12
Low Achievement13
Dropping Out14
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION16
Significance of Relationships Between Teachers and Children16
Understanding Relationships17
Instructional Approaches for Students and Educators17
Service Delivery Settings18
Instructional Approaches19
Teaching Methods20
Scaffolded Instruction20
Guided Practice20
Modeling20
Reciprocal Questioning21
Feedback21
Devices to Improve Learning21
Graphic Devices22
Verbal Devices22
Memory Devices22
Grouping Variations23
Learning Strategy Instruction23
CHAPTER 5: IMPLICATIONS25
Summary25
Implications26
Conclusion27
REFERENCES29
How can teachers effectively support at-risk students who struggle with literacy?
Chapter 1: Introduction
Background
Who is an “at-risk” learner? When and why is a student considered to be “at risk?” The label “at risk” gained prominence in the taxonomy of educational research in the 1980s subsequent to the publication of the commissioned report “A Nation at Risk.” This document both evidenced and lamented the status of the United States' educational system in comparison to the school systems of other industrialized nations around the world. America's schoolchildren, it argued, were falling behind the children in other technological-rich countries. Years after the publication of that landmark report, the at-risk label has been more liberally applied as a moniker to describe certain types of students. A politically loaded term, “at risk” is often used as a code word for various groups of less fortunate and dispossessed students in the United States. “At risk” primarily refers to those students from families and communities with limited resources corresponding to low educational outcomes. That is, at-risk students are those most likely to fail or drop out of school due to the challenges of poverty, broken homes, violence, limited English language proficiency, and other disadvantages in the family and community context.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to highlight the importance of effective support provided by teachers to at-risk learners, struggling with literacy.
Problem Statement
The associations among race, ethnicity, and low academic performance and/or school failure are positive, increasingly at risk has become code or synonyms for low-income (or poor) and racial and ethnic minority students. The two groups are not the same, however, despite the correlations. Perceived by some thinkers as a pejorative label of students believed to be “culturally deprived,” the term is laden with historical, political, and social meanings. A survey of the term's usages shows that its meaning varies.
Objectives
Developing an understanding of the nature of teacher-child relationships and how these relationships impact development is critical for researchers and practitioners in the field of education. The aims and objectives of this study are to provide an overview of:
(1) Relevant theory that informs the study of teacher-child relationships.