SUMMARY

Summary

Abolish the Juvenile Court

Law reform, repair or modify the boundaries of childhood, the judicial process will not significantly reduce the likelihood of criminal recidivism or expansion of social security. Or in a wide range of changes in the judicial system, only one crime and violence on the complex social issues, in the shortest possible results. On the contrary, the proposed abolition of all young offenders into the justice system does not claim the juvenile court of any utilitarian and effort, but the name of some countries to force an honest commitment to the countries that bear the social control and punishment of crimes of young offenders in juvenile courts of there, rehabilitation of juvenile courts to keep the realism in its penal wing and destroy its legitimacy and undermine its capacity as an objective judicial body.

Since punishment is unpleasant topic, a juvenile court's efforts to avoid being vague euphemisms and rehabilitation, psychological babble unpleasant reality, the quality of justice "double speak" like "Sometimes, the treatment of punishment." In contrast, defects that the juvenile court system can be a successful crime, social organize and social welfare thinking together. In the same way, a divide "criminal" juvenile court cannot be successful or long-term survival, because it requires a coherent justification, from the "real" distinction between the criminal courts. Improved technical protections, "youth discount" sentences, understanding and age, temperament amenities, and to "real" youth and adult offenders in the justice system, the development of processing differences.

Because of these policy proposals, asked state legislators through their courage, some food for thought, whether in the comment "hard" political climate, to make it clear to the elected officials of the contemporary juvenile court implicitly leniency. Although the public (166) can be tolerated in low visibility inadvertently management of young criminals, juvenile proceedings in the name of sanctions, politicians may hesitate to publicly acknowledge a moderate policy.

Many elected officials are often based on crime and political agitator "against" youth crime, education, and does not control the judicial system, its true limits of open positions. Some fans prefer to ignore the evidence that the rise in incarceration rate policy is a failure; it will eventually lead to fiscal and moral bankruptcy of political advantage afraid of fire. (Rosenheim 236)

I suggest abolishing the juvenile court's fear. On the single hand, combined with strengthening and "youth discount" in one incorporated criminal court may offer more protection and justice ...