Rights of Homosexuals

Should Homosexual Have the Same Rights of Heterosexual Citizens?



Should Homosexual Have the Same Rights of Heterosexual Citizens?

Introduction

The term homosexuality emerged in 19th-century expert discourse to pass on primarily to men's homosexual desire; during the 20th century, the term increasingly came to refer to female homosexual desire. Since the 1970s, the terms gay and lesbian have developed to distinguish between male and female identity and experience(Sullivan, 2006). The issue of homosexuality is important to theoretical debates about the social construction of sexuality and gender and is often the focus of discussions about the relationship between sexuality, gender, and power. Studies variously emphasize the historical, cultural, and relational nature of constructions of homosexuality in exploring its interrelatedness with gender. Some theorists have examined this interrelatedness as part of broader explorations of the centrality of sexuality to the modern social order. Other theorists have examined this interrelatedness for the insights it generates into gender relations in the patriarchal order(Evans, 2007). Social and cultural theorists have achieved a broad consensus that homosexuality is, in one way or another, bound up with the regulation of sexual and gender “norms,” and that its study illuminates operations of power and resistance with respect to sexuality and gender (Heaphy, Donovan, Weeks, 2004). This entry discusses some of the issues, including the language of homosexuality, the construction of homosexuality, gender ideologies, and homosexual practices.

The Language of Homosexuality

Cases of homosexual desire and homosexual sexual relations have been recorded throughout history and across cultures. These are often cited as evidence for the historical and cross-cultural existence of homosexuality (Heaphy, Donovan, Weeks, 2004). Social and cultural theorists distinguish between these cases and the specific phenomena of “homosexuality” that has been discussed in expert (sexual, medical, psychological, and legal) discourse since the 19th century. In this latter context, homosexuality was assumed to be a pathological condition based on the “abnormal” sexual desire for a person of the same sex (National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, 2004). The terminology of homosexuality emerged in European expert discourse about sexuality toward the end of the 19th century. This was initially used in conjunction with ideas about homosexuality as gender inversion—that is, to explain homosexuals as persons whose sexual desires were rooted in innate gender dysfunction (Clarke, Finaly, 2004). Homosexuality was the dominant way of talking about homosexual desire for much of the 20th century; this discourse contributed to the notion that sexual desire was a defining property of the person. The language of homosexuality was crucial to the discursive construction of morally deviant sexual practices and pathologically deviant personalities. This laid the ground for experts and legislators to define, outlaw, and seek to correct sexual deviance and were crucial to how modern societies defined abnormal and unnatural (homosexual) sexualities as the binary opposite of normal and natural (heterosexual) sexualities(Sullivan, 2006).

The power of the discourse of homosexuality is partly evident in the ways men and women themselves took up the language in their own understandings of their desires, identities, and ...