Relationship between political communication and political socialization
The network of media to inform the electorate and the decisions of citizens to elect their representatives are two of the pillars of a democratic society. Learning politically relevant social attitudes and the acquisition of policy-relevant personality traits are forms of political socialization. Stable functioning of the political system of society, to preserve the integrity of the social organism requires constant reproduction and development of political culture, which is carried through the assimilation and acceptance of people of its norms, values ??and patterns of political behavior. This process is called political socialization.
In modern political science, there is no generally accepted picture of the scope, duration, and developmental stages of the process of political socialization. Most often, under the political socialization of the individual to understand the process of learning developed by society political orientations, attitudes and patterns of political behavior, ensuring its adequate participation in the political life of society.
The most important function of political socialization is the achievement of individual skills to navigate the political system, they perform certain functions. Otherwise, a person can not effectively defend their social and political interests. Political socialization is a very complex process of interaction between the individual and the political system. On the one hand, political socialization includes the intended effect of the political system on the individual and represents the transfer of the individual in society political orientations, values ??and patterns of political behavior. On the other hand, political socialization includes the individual's own activity, ie the transformation of society, the rules proposed in the political culture of their own values ??and attitudes. In this regard, the influence of the political system to the political formation of the personality, to some extent depends on the internal beliefs of the individual.
However parties that receive less than 1% of the vote do not receive any seats (Storm, 2007). Furthermore, there are 400 seats in parliament, thus if a party gets a percentage of 25 of the votes, then it will be allocated 100 seats (Storm, 2007). This would then mean that the top 100 people on the party's list will represent it in parliament. On the contrary an election does not always result in a perfectly rounded percentage, but Strom (2007) articulates that there is a formula which deals with a scenario like that as fairly as possible.
In case of South Africa, the PR system appeared to be a fair electoral system for the new democracy in 1994. In this regard by choosing a PR, the leaders of South Africa committed to a broad sharing of power in South Africa, while the ANC gained the majority of votes there was plenty of room for other parties to be represented to too (Storm,2007). Clearly in 1994 this choice of system demonstrated a desire to create an open society, in which people of all races and political opinions could co-exist and make their voices heard, as at that time the main concern for South Africa was to ...