Effects Of Comprehensive Education On Elementary School Student Performance On Standardized Exams
Table of Contents
Objective4
Data Analysis5
Descriptive statistics5
School 1 Data6
Table 16
Fig 17
Fig 27
Fig 38
Fig 48
Fig 59
Fig 69
Fig 710
Fig 810
School 2 Data10
Table 211
Fig 912
Fig 1012
Fig 1113
Fig 1213
Fig 1314
Fig 1414
Fig 1515
Fig 1615
Chi-Square16
Chi Square test for School 1 Data18
Table 318
Table 419
Table 519
Table 620
Value20
df20
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)20
Table 720
Table 820
Table 921
Table 1021
Chi Square test for School 2 Data22
Table 1122
Table 1222
Table 1323
Table 1423
Table 1523
Table 1624
Table 1724
Table 1825
One way ANOVA25
One way ANOVA for School 1 Data27
Table 1927
Table 2027
Table 2128
Table 2229
Table 2329
Table 2430
Table 2531
Table 2631
One way ANOVA for School 2 Data32
Table 2732
Table 2833
Table 2933
Table 3034
Table 3135
Table 3235
Table 3336
Table 3437
Discussion and Conclusion37
References54
Chapter # 4 Data Analysis
Objective
The main objective of this study is to compare student performance on Criterion Reference Tests (CTR) in two rural Nevada elementary schools, one of which utilized a comprehensive educational curriculum (CEC) and the other used the current academic trend that addresses No Child Left Behind (NCLB) standards. Both North and South Elementary Schools participate in the Criterion Reference Test (CRT). This test is used to evaluate the progress of schools toward AYP. The test data involved 3rd and 5th grade students who participated in the CRT reading and mathematics testing program during the 2004-2007 school years.
This chapter will introduce the schools used in the study and provide information regarding the school demographics of the schools involved. Additionally, the curriculum models used by both schools will be described in detail pertaining to daily curriculum offered to students. Finally, the methodology of the research will be described and the format of the projects will become apparent.
This research may provide implications for student achievement using two different curricular approaches to education. The first approach is the NCLB core-curriculum model that promotes increased core curriculum allocated time while reducing time and opportunities for non-core curriculum. The second approach is the comprehensive educational curriculum (CEC) system in which students are provided with daily opportunities in non-core curriculum and core curricular focus and intensity is applied within the framework of the existing school day. Based on the findings of this research project, we may provide better information to administrators regarding curricular offering. This research then, may add to the dialogue relative to differing curricular approaches to meet the demands of NCLB. Furthermore, implications from this project could enable school administrators and local school boards curricular options which could include maintaining programs currently in existence instead of reducing or cutting current non-core curriculum levels to justify existences.
The scope of this study will examine the effects of comprehensive educational programs on elementary school student performance on standardized exams. This study will use mathematics and reading Criterion Reference Test (CRT) data from two rural Nevada elementary schools that are demographically similar, but that provided education programs fundamentally differently. One school provided a comprehensive education program, while the other a core focused curriculum.
Descriptive statistics
We use descriptive statistics to describe the main features of a collection of data in quantitative terms. Most statistics can be used either as a descriptive statistic, or in an inductive ...