MOVIE 12 ANGRY MEN

Movie 12 Angry Men

Movie 12 Angry Men

In the video "Twelve furious men" an eighteen year vintage is ascribed with the killing of his father. At first, all the jurors accept as factual that he is at fault after a sensible question, except for one, who accepts as factual that they owe the young man more than five minutes in concluding if he inhabits or not. The man who does not accept as factual that the young man is at fault interprets his outlooks to remainder of the jurors and is mocked by remainder of the jurors. A vintage man subsequent sees where he is going with his reasoning and when the next ballot is finished, he furthermore votes innocent. The jurors extend to talk about the case and convey up some significant details supportive the teen-ager. Gradually, more and more jurors change their brain, and the ones that don't, get more and more outraged.

Juror eight, an architect performed by Henry Fonda, has powerful sentiments in the direction of the young men vote. He is a serene and brave man who battles to glimpse that fairness is to be conveyed out before concluding on it so quickly. He is the first to state that they should not less than reconsider the details of the case before they drive him off to die. He furthermore indicates some flaws in the vintage man's testimony, and verifies that they will not put all their believe in what the vintage man has to say. One of the last parts of clues that juror eight adds to vigilance is the way the boy's dad was stabbed. He gets it into the other juror's minds that there is sensible question, and keeps the boy's life because he concludes to reconsider the details of the case with the jury. Unlike juror eight, 10 is an furious and are not fond of the young man, which sways his vote. Ten furthermore accepts as factual that he's at fault up until the end of the video, and is certainly mentioning to the boy's racial assembly as "them," and "those people," due to the detail he was Puerto Rican. Ten was not a equitable man, and appeared very prejudice in the direction of the young man and saying who he did not worth human life. The contradictory sentiments that 10 had contrary to the young man initiated him to ballot at fault for the most of the movie.

In the starting of this movie juror eight did not accept as factual the young man was blameless but he liked to outlook the details mindfully before he dispatched a young man to die. He conveyed to the table the testimonies and clues and examined them all mindfully, examining the little minutia as well as the large-scale ones. He had a hard time believing everything the observers had to state at the stand. For demonstration, he acted on as the vintage man the evening of the killing making up he ...