LAW - LEGAL ISSUES

Debate on the common law of employment in USA and Canada

Debate on the common law of employment in USA and Canada

Introduction

This research is an argumentative essay about the common laws of employment that has developed a law system of protection of economic interest of organizations, in relation to the little regards on the interest of the employee. Whereas, one of the statements arise that modern Canadian judges are more protective about the employee concerns in Canada.

In this study, we try to explore the concept of economic interest of employees in Canada and the entire USA in a holistic context. The main focus of the research is on employment laws and its relation with the organization as well as employee direct benefits. The research also analyzes various aspects of various laws and tries to gauge its effect on employee motivation and learning.

Discussion

The employment gets regarded as the relationship between the employer and employee in terms of provision of benefits to the organization in economic terms. This relationship can consist of an immigrant laborer working in the hot sun picking bushels, or a person worked 40 years in the same office. Every employee has same needs and somewhat differing needs as per the circumstances. These issues got discussed by laws and policy for the equal opportunity of life-style. Contrary to popular belief, U.S. law applies to relations labor is highly developed and complex. Legal actions of employees in the U.S. are also common, and the courts do not hesitate to condemn the companies to pay damages up to very high amounts (Mathias, 2009).

The argument that the common laws of employment have developed a system of economic interests rather than considering the interest of individual employee has various contradictions to it. The laws which get formulated by the authorities talk about the interests, and rights of both the organization and employees, but they get violated by the concern organizations that follow the law, and they tend to manipulate the law as per their requirements.

For example, a person may misuse the law if he knows that the employee is not aware about the laws of the state. The poor workers in the farms get highly subjugated with the law difference, whereas usually the city employee gets control of laws but most of time vague (De Dreu, 2008).

The federal statutes posed principles for relations of work. Applicable throughout the United States, these principles guarantee employees a minimum protection to all employers required to provide. Federal agencies shall ensure compliance with these rules. These laws allow states wide latitude in establishing State laws is more favorable to employees. They have virtually all of its own rules regarding discrimination, dismissal, salary and working time, responsibility of the employer for damage caused by its employees and of course tax and social security contributions. Each state has a specialized administration for matters relating to employment in his constituency.

Thesis Argument on Statement # 1

The common law of united is a tool that interprets and creates the ...