Managers are increasingly aware of how knowledge can affect their company's competitive position and are attempting to use knowledge to sustain organizational performance and gain market share. Unfortunately, knowledge management research is fragmented across a variety of disciplines. It is also fragmented conceptually, particularly with respect to the concepts that researchers and organizations identify as significant. We constructed an integrated framework for measuring the various aspects of knowledge management strategy, knowledge management enablers, and knowledge management process capability to assess their effectiveness in improving knowledge management performance. Studying a sample of firms from the United States software industry, we found support for the importance of knowledge management strategy and knowledge management enablers in improving knowledge management performance, and mixed results for the importance of knowledge management process capability in improving knowledge management performance.
Table of Contents
Abstract2
Introduction4
Knowledge5
Taxonomies of Knowledge6
Knowledge Management7
Knowledge Management Strategy8
Knowledge Management Enablers11
Technology11
Organizational Culture13
Knowledge Management Process Capability14
Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition15
Knowledge Upgrade Capability15
Knowledge Protection Capability16
Knowledge Conversion Capability16
Knowledge Application Capability17
Sample Selection18
Methodology18
Results19
Hypothesis 1: Strategy Improves Performance19
Hypothesis 2: The Use of Enablers Improves Performance19
Hypothesis 3: Increased Process Capability Improves Performance20
Conclusions21
Limitations and Future Research22
References23
Appendices28
Knowledge Management
Introduction
Successful managers recognize that "the competitive advantage of firms in today's global economy stems not from market position but from the ownership, employment, or both, of difficult to replicate knowledge assets and the manner in which they are in fact deployed" (Teece, 2009, p. 194). This focus on knowledge as a core capability of the firm echoes Drucker's (1995) observation that "knowledge has become the key economic resource and the dominant and perhaps even the only source of comparative advantage" (p. 287). Shortly after making that statement, Drucker (2000) predicted that by the year 2005, more than one third of the U.S. labor force would be made up of knowledge workers.
Suggesting that building a knowledge -based theory of the firm would be a valuable tool for researchers, Grant (1996) proposed a model that recognized organizational capability, organizational design, decision-making mechanisms, and the boundaries of the firm. However, this formulation omits what is perhaps the most critical element of knowledge management, the ability to transfer that knowledge between and among members of the organization.
Unfortunately, knowledge management research is fragmented across a variety of disciplines as well as by the concepts viewed as significant by researchers and firms. For example, various scholars view knowledge management strategy, knowledge management enablers, or knowledge management process capability as the key determinant of knowledge management performance. We propose an integrated framework for measuring the various aspects of knowledge management and assessing their effectiveness in improving overall organizational performance.
Managers are increasingly aware of how knowledge can affect their company's competitive position and are attempting to use knowledge to sustain organizational performance and gain market share. Unfortunately, knowledge management research is fragmented across a variety of disciplines. It is also fragmented conceptually, particularly with respect to the concepts that researchers and organizations identify as significant. We constructed an integrated framework for measuring the various aspects of knowledge management strategy, knowledge management enablers, ...