This paper focuses on the importance of thinking and volition when considering how Immanuel Kant's ethical theory differs from other theories of ethics. The author discusses ideas from "The Critique of Pure Reason" and "The Critique of Practical Reason", highlighting key points such as Kant's categorical imperative project, and the role of personal thought within his philosophy. I would like to encourage reflection on how and why Kant refers to an ethics under the primacy of reason and, more fundamentally, whether there can be no ethics without a basic, compatible man. Kant's view of man is revealed in nested sets, designed to last in their grammatical element, almost a language of pure reason. Yet Kant does not forget the people he considers his claims. He knows the reality of their skills that exist with the potential of their opportunities.
From Kant's practical philosophy, especially his contributions in the later writings, you can now learn that issues of justification and the application must be differentiated, for the purpose of the theoretical conceptual clarification that these two dimensions of ethics in the performance of a specific moral reflection but just cannot be divorced, but must engage each other. The interesting thing about Kant's practical philosophy, in my view this is that it provides us mainly with methods to investigate practical demands and to generate moral orientations, so that it also shows that constitute it obtained results are not isolated and in this sense "absolute" values but only in the moments in a terminological sense "critical" reflection process are completed, which can be found only through this process their justification. This constructive dimension of Kant's ethics is the one I trust a productive and enlightening contribution to the part in scholastic divisions seized and object as well as their ...