According to Kant, before the Fall, Adam and Eve were perfect. They were blameless and ignorant, yet flawless, so they were permitted to abide in the occurrence of God. Once they partook of the crop of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, although, they directly became unclean as well as mortal. In Billy Budd, the scribe, Herman Melville, presents a inquiry that arises exactly from this initial sin of our first parents: Is it better to be blameless and ignorant, but good and righteous, or is it better to be skilled and knowledgeable? I accept as factual that through this publication, Kant is telling us that we require to hit some kind of balance between these two ideas; we require to have ethics and virtue; we require to be in the world, but not of the world.
To show his topic, Melville values a couple of individual characteristics that are all very distinct, the most significant of which is Billy Budd. Billy is the focal issue of the publication and the lone individual who we are intended to discover the most from. On the boat, the Rights-of-Man, Billy is a cynosure amidst his shipmates; a foremost, not by administration, but by example. All the constituents of the crew gaze up to him and love him. He is 'strength and beauty. Tales of his prowess [are] recited. Ashore he [is] the champion, afloat the spokesman; on every apt event habitually foremost'.
Despite his attractiveness amidst the crew and his hardworking mind-set, Billy is moved to another British boat, the Indomitable. It is here, furthermore, that Billy encounters John Claggart, the master-at-arms. A man 'in who was the mania of an bad environment, not engendered by vicious teaching or corrupting publications or licentious dwelling but born with him and innate, in short 'a depravity according to nature''. (Richard, 97)
Here then, is offered a man with a character and feature to compare and confrontation with Billy's. Sweet, blameless Billy directly recognizes that this man is somebody he does not desire to traverse and so after glimpsing Claggart whip another crew-member for neglecting his responsibilities, Billy 'resolved that not ever through remissness would he make himself liable to such a visitation or manage or omit aught that might deserve even verbal reproof'. Billy is so good and so blameless that he endeavours his hardest to stay out of trouble. 'What then was his shock and ...