The usual objections to the sort of national program of Canada may be based on a number of ideas we can anticipate. First, we can't afford a national health care system. A single-payer system would be far more cost-effective, since it would eliminate excess administrative costs, profits, cost-shifting and unnecessary duplication. Furthermore, it would permit the establishment of an overall budget and the fair and rational distribution of resources.
Secondly, innovative technologies would be scarce under a single-payer system. We would have long waiting lists for operations and procedures, and ...