Informed consent is a process. Its purpose is to provide information to potential study subjects to enable the individuals to make an informed decision if they want to take a part in any research or not. It also ensures that the subject's rights are protected and that subjects understand that participation is voluntary. An investigator may not involve any individual in a clinical study without first obtaining an Informed Consent from the individual. Informed consent is a part of the recommendations included in procedures required to ensure subject safety in clinical trials.
Discussion
Authors of philosophical, legal, psychological, and regulatory literature have frequently tried to analyze or define “informed consent” in terms of its parts. These are the distinguished factors;
competence
comprehension
consent
disclosure
voluntariness
These factors are seen as logical points of an informed consent that illustrate lawful requirement but they do not observe the connotation of informed consent. This is believed that the researcher has an informed consent for a participation providing the partaker is informed to continue, knows the disclosed information, he gets a full revelation about the process, performs gladly, and consents. (DesJardins 2000)
Ethical Dilemma
Informed Consent, in my opinion, has some dilemmas. For example, the Ethical and Biomedical works have emphasized that the justification of an essential informed consent is the moral standard of independence but in fact the ground definition of Ethical Dilemma varies person to person or culture to culture. Respect for autonomy and Autonomy are expressions tentatively linked with a number of notions, for instance choosing freely, voluntariness, privacy, self-mastery, accepting duty for one's choices, and choosing person's own ethical position. Many matters about this consent risk the end to value autonomy, which varies from under-disclosure of relevant data to non-acknowledgment of a denial of associations. To value an independent person is ...