The purpose of this study was to perform a qualitative, inductively-oriented investigation of cross cultural leadership and motivational improvement (motivational strategy) efforts. This approach was chosen given that there is relatively little evidence regarding the nature of effective cross cultural leadership as organizations pursue motivational strategy, potential differences across managerial levels, and the persistence of cross cultural leadership as motivational strategy efforts evolve. Our qualitative analyses involved the identification of relevant themes or categorical schemes, data collection in an open and somewhat unstructured manner, and theory development in line with the data collected. Based on the analyses, we develop a proposed model of alternative paths of cross cultural leadership and managed commitment in association with a motivational strategy process. One path involves continuing commitment toward motivational strategy efforts and results in a culture shift. In contrast, a second path involves wavering commitment and could lead to negative outcomes such as cynicism about the possibility of Algerian leaders change. In sum, this study demonstrates the potential value of pursuing an inductive approach in cross cultural leadership research.
Table of content
ABSTRACT2
CHAPTER I- INTRODUCTION5
Introduction5
The context of research6
Cross cultural leadership and Motivational Improvement6
Research Objective8
Research of Methodology10
Incremental vs. Radical Motivational Improvement17
CHAPTER II- LITERATURE REVIEW19
Introduction19
Project Globe20
Virtual Teams21
Kick The Habit23
Uncertainty avoidance27
Individualism- collectivism28
Power distance30
Masculinity-femininity31
Cultural aspects have a lower profile in African negotiations.35
Negotiations are inter-company activities35
The post-negotiation stage38
CHAPTER III- METHODOLOGY47
Method47
General design47
Selection and Description of Cases and Participants48
Manufacturing Plant Case48
Hospital Case49
National Police Force Case50
General Data Collection Procedures52
DATA ANALYSIS54
CHAPTER IV- ANALYSIS OF THE FINDINGS58
Results And Discussion58
Qualitative Examination of Research Questions58
Question One58
Question 2A61
Question 367
Question 471
Question 572
Question 673
Question 775
Toward A Model Of Cross Cultural Leadership And Commitment77
CHAPTER V88
Conclusions88
References91
Table 1 Mentions of cross cultural leadership Categories Targeted at Top and Middle Management Levels99
Chapter I- Introduction
Introduction
It may now be a cliche to suggest that cross cultural leadership is an essential ingredient of motivational improvement (motivational strategy) processes. Beginning with the pioneers of the motivational revolution, individuals such as W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran have repeatedly suggested the importance of cross cultural leadership for the achievement of significant Algerian leaders advances in motivational (Deming, 1986; Juran, 1989). Despite the attention paid by these individuals as well as others in the popular motivational literature, relatively little work has been devoted toward a systematic understanding of cross cultural leadership processes in relation to motivational strategy efforts. (Dean, Bowen, 2004, 392-418)
The purpose of the current research is to perform a qualitative, inductively-oriented investigation of cross cultural leadership and motivational strategy efforts. This approach was chosen given the relative dearth of research surrounding this issue. Indeed, little is known about the nature of effective cross cultural leadership as organizations pursue motivational strategy, potential differences across hierarchical levels, and the persistence of cross cultural leadership as motivational strategy efforts evolve. (Dean, Bowen, 2004, 392-418) The present research heeds the suggestion offered by Dean and Bowen (1994,p. 399) that firms attempting motivational strategy "may be provocative sites for studying the relevance of cross cultural ...