Constitutional Laws and Offender Treatment Analysis

Constitutional Laws and Offender Treatment Analysis

Introduction

United States has one of the most transparent constitutional laws and offender treatment system all around the globe. The laws are enacted to provide adequate powers to system officials and security personnel to arrest the suspected offenders and wrong doers in a society as well as to protect the rights of citizens of America and other foreigners (Amar, 2005).

The laws associated with arresting, detaining and searching are mostly given to powers of police covered under the statute. Generally, the powers and authorities of police are covered under US constitution law, which contains various codes of conduct of criminal justice officials that are required to follow the process of arresting, detaining and searching for suspected offenders. The law further divided into various constitutional amendments where fourth amendment contains the discussion of search of premises, detention and recording of interviews (Justia US SCC, 2010).

Discussion

Statutory Authority and Responsibilities

Various researchers found that police failure to comply with relevant legislation generally leads to unlawful code of practice which deteriorates the case of suspect as there is likelihood that innocent citizens get arrested and detained. The initial constitution creates great confusion between original stated law and its amendments. For instance, US constitution law protects the general rights of common citizen under which if he is arrested as a suspect would be treated with decency, whereas fourth amendment contrast with how arrested person should be offered food and drink and facilitated with sleeping hours under specific conditions (Coppolo, 2006).

Arrests of suspected offenders are only lawful if it comes under specific legal authority. The cases of serious criminal offences give authority to officials under U.S Constitution law code of practices. The U.S constitution law states that arresting legal official must have valid reasons based on ...