COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE CONCEPT OF NATURE

Compare and Contrast the Concept of Nature

Compare and Contrast the Concept of Nature

Introduction

They are different aspects of nature, and different writers use the term nature in several different manners. The elements, animals, and nature are mentioned by the Iroquois as they outline their political process; whereas the meaning of nature was way different in the perception of Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan discussing philosophical and religious living - In a Divine and Supernatural Light and Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God; Later American writers present nature when discussing their spiritual beliefs and how to go about living in the world.

This research paper will compare and contrast the concept of nature from the earliest writings (the Iroquois League, John Winthrop and the Jonathan Edwards) to the later American idea of nature found in the work of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. The study will reflect the understanding of the works of the writers and compare how earlier works influences the later pieces. The study will also analyze how the literature reflected the culture of the time.

Discussion

Philosophy of Puritan in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and “A Model of Christian Charity”.

Two American authors from the past era Edwards and John Winthrop featured rather very brief in mutual understanding despite a fact that they both were the believers of the one set of rationales in the Christian religion. Possibly this conflict is due to the states of affairs both have confronted during their time of composing preachings. Jonathan Edwards experienced as if the principles that the modern world were rested on were dislocating whereas, Winthrop, published while on the brink of a fresh spiritual and societal understanding.

When it pertains to executing a psychoanalysis of both writers from early American literature, it should be observed that all the same, both Edwards and the Puritan John Winthrop have a number of traits mutual to Puritan authors, and though these are conveyed otherwise, the like common apprehension of Almighty as a divinity who longed-for his citizens to guide adept, generous livings is at hand all over. Even though these fluctuations between the two authors could be situational, it's of significant value researching how they were alike established on common thoughts of Puritan (Nicole S, 2011).

Contrary to a few earliest spectacular Puritans, Edwards employs the “fire and brimstone” advance to present his folds with what he experiences to be the wrath of Almighty. The preaching, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” was intended to constitute Jonathan Edward's reviewers cognizant of the reality that their conduct and behavior on earth was way more significant than anything else and that specific penalty in hell anticipated those who didn't stick to right spiritual principles as conveyed in the Holy Scripture, Bible. Though Jonathan Edwards distinctly desired to have an effect on the progressively dissimilar conduct of the settlers, he believed it most effectual to talk about Almighty's rage with rearing sin instead of extend gentle protests about iniquitous conduct. To accomplish his end of constituting his congregants cognizant of their unstable perspective on earth he prompted them of the force of Almighty and his ...