According to an old saying, "Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak. But there is another sense in which seeing comes before words. It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words but words can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relation between what we see and what we know is never settled." The way we see things is affected by what we know and what we believe. This paper discusses the importance of art is the schools.
Discussion
Supporters of the arts in schools state that learning arts develop the overall value of children's life, motivate monetary growth for their future, teaches multicultural tolerance & knowledge and award individuals a mass of other benefits and are, thus, valuable of funding by the government and also be taught and learnt enthusiastically. The way in which we interpret the world begins with sight - viewing and interpreting the world around us. This interpretation continues throughout our lives and evolves as we add language and experiences, values, and beliefs to our reservoir of resources and thought. This interpretation and understanding of the world around us is built on aesthetics- what we see and what it means to us. For some this is a simplistic definition of "Art". (Davis 2007)
This leads one to the question, "What place, role, or foundation do the arts play in public education?" Are there schools successfully implementing arts in education in which the arts are not a "program" or thing you go somewhere and "do" once a week, but the arts are simply part of everything they do. It is a part of the underlining culture of what is important to that school and community. It is a common language used throughout the campus and a common understanding that appears seamless and natural. If so then one must question - how was/is this achieved? Does the school have to be an "Arts" school, such as a focus school or charter within a public school district to be successful in arts education? Can any and all schools achieve this? Is it important? Should the arts be viewed as an essential part of human development and one of the forms of intelligence? How do educational policy and learning theorists view it currently and historically? These many questions are the foundation of this study. (Efland 2007)
Historically the public school educational focus has been on science and math, as we struggle to keep up with our European counterparts in these areas. Aesthetics has been devalued and concrete, scientific thought encouraged. The value of visual and spatial intelligence is essential to success in the areas of science and mathematics and is only developed when addressed throughout the curriculum. One must ask themselves, how can we separate these needs and what must be lost by isolating them in development? Elementary ...