The following tables shows the frequency distribution for the given variables
Statistics
Gender
Age
Department
Position
Tenure
N
Valid
50
50
50
50
50
Missing
0
0
0
0
0
Gender
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
male
19
38.0
38.0
38.0
female
31
62.0
62.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Age
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
16 - 21
8
16.0
16.0
16.0
22 - 49
42
84.0
84.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Department
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Human Resources
16
32.0
32.0
32.0
Information Technology
33
66.0
66.0
98.0
Administration
1
2.0
2.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Position
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Hourly Employee (Overtime Eligible)
40
80.0
80.0
80.0
Salaried Employee (No Overtime)
10
20.0
20.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Tenure
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Less than 2 years
24
48.0
48.0
48.0
2 to 5 years
24
48.0
48.0
96.0
Over 5 Years
2
4.0
4.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Graphical Representation
A "normal" circulation of variety outcomes in a exact bell-shaped bend, with the largest issue in the middle and easily arching symmetrical gradients on both edges of center. The characteristics of the benchmark usual circulation are tabulated in most statistical quotation works, permitting the somewhat so straightforward estimation of localities under the bend at any point.
A "skewed" circulation is one that is not symmetrical, but rather has a long follow in one direction. If the follow expands to the right, the bend is said to be right-skewed, or positively skewed. If the follow expands to the left, it is contrary skewed. PathMaker calculates the skewness of a histogram, and exhibitions it with the other statistics. Where skewness is present, vigilance should generally be concentrated on the follow, which could continue after the method specification restricts, and where much of the promise for enhancement usually lies.
Regression analysis
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Age
58.78
5.441
100
Gender
145.80
36.843
100
Satisfaction
1.21
.891
100
Correlations
Age
Gender
Satisfaction
Pearson Correlation
Age
1.000
.691
.158
Gender
.691
1.000
.046
Satisfaction
.158
.046
1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Age
.
.000
.059
Gender
.000
.
.326
Satisfaction
.059
.326
.
N
Age
100
100
100
Gender
100
100
100
Satisfaction
100
100
100
This table gives details of the correlation between each pair of variables. We do not want strong correlations between the criterion and the predictor variables. The values here are acceptable.
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
Method
1
Satisfaction, Gendera
.
Enter
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: Age
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
1
.703a
.494
.483
3.912
a. Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction, Gender
This table is important. The Adjusted R Square value tells us that our model accounts for 70.3% of variance in the ages it can be concluded that it is very good model.