Utilitarians

Philosophers Bent ham and James Mill presented an ethical theory, utilitarianism, planning that all action ought to be focused toward achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest diagram of people. Utilitarians further argue that achieving the greatest happiness overall is not simply the right thing to do for society but also moral. Although this theory is applicable in many situations, after one takes a closer facade it is clear to suppose that utilitarianism is immoral.( Silverstein, 212)

Utilitarians further rationalize to be a moral is, by definition, to be anxious with promoting the well-being of others, not just oneself. Well-being is motivated by happiness (however happiness is construed in detail). So to be moral is to be anxious with promoting the happiness of others, not just oneself. But morality requires also that one not favor any particular person. To do so would be unfair. We may leave this by saying that morality requires impartiality. So to be moral requires that one be impartial in being anxious with promoting each person's happiness equally. This is, afterward, to be anxious with maximizing overall happiness.  This rationalization corresponds well with the trust of utilitarianism, however if this rationalization is truly moral, afterward every utilitarian judgment ought to be moral.( Silverstein, 214)

When analyzing certain situations it is clear to suppose that achieving overall happiness can actually be immoral. One hypothetical case that contradicts morality in utilitarianism is a situation involving a professor any person who receives tortured to bring happiness to his students. Assume that a professor is extremely detested by his class of thirty scholars because he is a harsh grader. After all the scholars receive broke midterm grades, they finally receive fed higher with the professor and decide to torture him. From a futilitarian's point of outlook, the scholars will analyze this situation through ...