[Use of Social Media to Monitor and Predict Outbreaks and Public Opinion on Health Topics]
by
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would take this opportunity to thank my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this research would not have been possible.
DECLARATION
I, [type your full first names and surname here], declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the University.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
ABSTRACT
This thesis reports on the use of Twitter during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic to explore its use as an "infoveillance" approach complementary to traditional surveys and content analysis. This study aimed to: 1) report on the use of "H1N1" versus "swine flu", 2) conduct a qualitative analysis of tweet content, and 3) assess the feasibility of Twitter as a real-time content, sentiment, and public attention trend tracking tool. A manual content analysis of tweets revealed that H1N1 resources were the most commonly shared. Few tweets provided inaccurate information. News websites were the most popular resources while official agencies were rarely referenced directly. Our automated analysis correlated well with manual results and showed that Twitter activity was influenced by external events. This study describes the character and quality of Twitter communications during the H1N1 pandemic, and illustrates the potential of using social media to conduct real-time "infodemiology" studies for public health.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT2
DECLARATION3
ABSTRACT4
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION7
Research Objectives:10
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW12
Social Media13
Social Media Applications15
Facebook15
Flickr21
YouTube21
Internet & Social Media Usage27
Twitter Usage29
Social Media Analytics32
Public Health Emergencies34
The Social Amplification of Risk & Social Media37
Specific CDC Social Media Campaigns38
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)39
Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)40
The Public's Use of Social Media & Web 2.0 in Emergencies40
2003 SARS Epidemic41
August 29, 2005 Hurricane Katrina43
May 12, 2008 China Sichuan Earthquake49
2008 Hurricane Gustav & Ike51
2009 Red River Flooding52
January 13, 2010 Haiti Earthquake54
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY56
Data Collection & Database58
Knowledge Translation: H1N1 versus Swine Flu Terminology59
Audit of Retweets60
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS61
Effectiveness of Youtube and other social networks69
Infodemiology & Infoveillance71
Infodemiology Applications in Research72
Infodemiology Applications in Public Health75
Implications to public relations theory76
Implications for practice78
Advantages & Disadvantages of Infodemiology Approaches85
Public Perceptions & Attitudes towards H1N187
Emotional Responses to H1N188
H1N1 Vaccination Attitudes & Intentions88
Perceptions of Authorities90
Information Needs & Sources90
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION95
Overview of Principle Findings95
Knowledge Translation: H1N1 versus Swine Flu Terminology95
Tweet Content & Public Attention96
Retweets98
Information Demands & Sources99
Automated Analysis101
Methodological Limitations & Advantages102
Practical Implications for Public Health106
Research Objectives Revisited107
Future Directions109
REFERENCES112
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Most influenza viruses occur in birds, particularly the aquatic waterfowl that are their natural reservoir. Only a few types of influenza virus have circulated widely in humans. "Bird flu" refers colloquially to both influenza in birds and to instances when these avian viruses jump the species barrier to cause human disease. The influenza A genome encodes 2 major surface glycoproteins, the hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) proteins. The subtypes of these proteins are antigenetically distinct, having 16 H subtypes and 9 N subtypes. All of these subtypes may be found in birds, but only H1, H2, and H3 ...