Unequal Protection

Unequal Protection

Introduction

The criminal Justice System of United States has faced numerous challenges regarding unfair treatment of individuals presented in court. It has been a recurring issue in judiciary institutions and has attracted numerous public scrutiny and scholarly critics. It is examined that although the country has made noteworthy advancements toward the aim of guaranteeing equal and fair treatment for all civilians under law, still some of the cases demonstrate the unfair treatment of individuals. Whilst the judiciary laws are essentially unbiased and the judiciary structure is unambiguously based on the perceptions and pledges of impartiality, the management and enforcement of these edicts are crucially and persistently subjective. For several decades the concerns relating to elder law rights, children's rights and women's rights have been vastly discussed. Intellectuals deem that judiciary system in its interpretation and enforcement of the law has botched to deal with these problems. The document discusses the fundamental values of fair treatment through different dimensions. It deals with the basic mechanisms of fair trial methods to ensure the well being of society. Justice systems are the fundamental grounds for the progress of every country.

Discussion

While scrutinizing the issue of fair treatment in Judiciary system of United States, it is very important to analyze the legal framework of this system. This legal framework now comprises International law as well as national law. Apart from the legal framework, equal treatment policy is tremendously vital for the establishment of the perception of unbiased treatment and non-discrimination. Some of the very important questions that arise are in what way is equal treatment part of social life? Does unequal treatment infringes understood rules of gracious social communication? If so, should we discriminate, or treat individuals in a disparate way? These elements are vital to be considered.

Fair Treatment

The accountability for guaranteeing fairness and equality of treatment rests on shoulders of every individual concerned with the management of justice system. In carrying out the judicial procedure an individual must be aware to the actuality that the majority of individuals find their interaction with tribunal and appearance before court to be an intimidating practice and failure to pull up to their rightful expectation can possibly make them feel that they were not fairly treated. Individuals who are frequently experiencing underprivileged circumstances economically and socially may presume that their appearance in the court will be affected by their underprivileged destiny. Individuals who can presume this ...