The Practice of Just Compensation - A Review of the Article



The Practice of Just Compensation - A Review of the Article

Introduction

The article discusses the need for just practice when it comes to compensation. The purpose of the article is to guide the managers who determine the compensation of employees working at different levels in the organization. They have to remain prudent and ensure distributive justice. This means that not only the basic needs of the employers should be met, but they should also be treated in an impartial manner. It also discusses the practices of fairness in compensation for ordinary as well as non-ordinary employees. For the former, this means the assurance of human dignity for all employees, and, for the latter, it means commutative justice (Kennedy, 2009).

The duty to be fair

The paper discusses the unique nature of the employee and employer relationship. This has many obligations attached to it for both parties. The equitable compensation is one of the most important duties of an employer (Kennedy, 2009). The interesting part of the author is that he admits that no precise formula can be derived to come up with the fair compensation package for each employee. There are only guidelines that can be followed by managers, who are expected to use their best judgment when it comes to being fair with their employees.

The type of justice

In the light of Aristotle's two types of justices, the fair compensation package for all the employees is something that falls into both categories of distributive and commutative justice depending upon the context in which the matter is being discussed.

Justice in ordinary employment

By giving precise definitions of all the concepts discussed in the paper, the paper tells of the distributive justice problem as it relates to ordinary employees. The ordinary employees are ones who devote ...