The Myth of Male Decline

The Myth of Male Decline

Introduction

Stephanie Coontz is considered a national treasure for her outstanding feminist works. The article “The Myth of Male Decline” published in New York Times highlights the truth that male declination is still just a myth. And the writer has data to support that fact. Gender equality is such a sensitive and complex topic however as Ms. Coontz observes it is significant that we do not become satisfied with the supposition that women have lastly arrived at the cost of men. According to her, the epidemic of new books and articles declaring that we are on the edge of turning out to be a matriarchal society are paying no attention to the fact that males still make a lot of more money than females and dominate in influence and power.

Discussion

The gist of 'The Myth of Male Decline' is that in spite of all the latest 'news' of gender parity gains in the organizations, females are not doing as good as reported. Coontz argument is fundamentally that all this latest information on the subject of females doing better, and yet outperforming, males in the workplaces is seriously overstated and that it is yet fundamentally a 'male dominated' planet. According to Stephanie Coontz organizations are only putting this detail out there in order to hide the disparity that yet exists in the 'progressive' places of work today. She also rejects various assertions of progression for instance females having an advanced rate of college degrees plus a higher proportion of employment by picking out things such as surveys inquiring whether or not men or women required an education to do well and current employment compared with the jobs lost in the economy of today. Basically, 'The Myth of Male Decline' by Stephanie Coontz argues that regardless of what many people are saying regarding the development of gender parity in the United States, even though there have been advancements there is not yet the level of equality that there ought to be.

Coontz also provides significant statistics that while the wages of females have increased, their median earnings are yet lower than males. The median wages of female managers are just 73 percent of what male managers get. Also, only 4 percent CEOs of Fortune's top thousand organizations are females. Female MBAs are salaried a median of $4,600 less as compare to males in starting pays. According to Stephanie Coontz: “Studies show that as occupations gain a higher percentage of female workers, the pay for those jobs goes down relative to wages in similarly skilled jobs that remain bastions of male employment.”

Although females make up the mainstream of college graduates at the present, it has been debated that females need more learning just to offset the impact of conventional job inequity and conventional female vocation choices. Job separation by gender abridged significantly in the seventies and eighties however progress has come to a standstill since then. Females continue to be focus around areas of study that are deemed traditionally ...